: Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:28 am
LS16_Rhino wrote:
I have explain a simple premise to someone who is either being deliberately think or is just trying to be argumentative.
You don't need to explain yourself, your post tells the story, no amount of talking down to people will change that.
Let's just take a closer look at what you posted.
LS16_Rhino wrote:
I don’t think Hall has the skill set to play at top SL level
LS16_Rhino wrote:
he’s had enough chances to prove himself at top grade and tends to fluff it when the big games come around. Unnecessary errors and frequently out of position.
LS16_Rhino wrote:
I’m not writing his career off, just at Leeds.
There will shortly be two new clubs announced for entry into the SL who will be more than happy to employ the skills of the young Hall.
LS16_Rhino wrote:
How much of a chance does he need and at what price do we give him that chance? Giving him week in – week out first team experience has already cost us and, as seen yesterday, opposition teams target him as our weak link..
LS16_Rhino wrote:
he’s just not good enough to be playing for a ‘top’ SL team.
LS16_Rhino wrote:
Am I really the only person on this board who thinks that Hall has had enough chance to prove himself and is just a little lacking?
.....ably supported by the chief scout.
Gotcha wrote:
Nope. You are the one spot on, and others blinkered.
Hall simply does not have the ability to be a top class winger, with nothing in his armour to suggest otherwise. Potential for future in the pack though. But as a winger he offers no danger what so ever.
