: Sun Apr 12, 2009 4:43 pm  

harigeorgeson wrote:

- & anyway, you are the master at "Twaddle"

Nah, I'm still a mere apprentice at that (although I'm working on it...) but I'll never attain the heights of twaddledom that...certain other posters, already excel at...

: Sun Apr 12, 2009 4:45 pm  

Adeybull wrote:

Nah, I'm still a mere apprentice at that (although I'm working on it...) but I'll never attain the heights of twaddledom that...certain other posters, already excel at...

You are NOT the apprentice any more matey cos .........................

You're Fired

: Sun Apr 12, 2009 4:47 pm  

harigeorgeson wrote:

Ps If we are to win anything this year, then we need Deacon back to full fitness & top form, otherwise we do need another 7 asap.

I'd agree entirely with that - pretty much common sense! We may already have a 7 in Jeffries anyway, and IMO its anyway a 6 we really need.

: Sun Apr 12, 2009 4:47 pm  

harigeorgeson wrote:

You are NOT the apprentice any more matey cos .........................

You're Fired

I'll see you at the tribunal...

: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:03 pm  

According to Robbie Paul's analysis on the SLS today, this was a new rule brought in at the beginning of this season (if so, I don't remember reading about it).

: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:12 pm  

FoxyRhino wrote:

According to Robbie Paul's analysis on the SLS today, this was a new rule brought in at the beginning of this season (if so, I don't remember reading about it).

Neither do any of the players or coaching staff

: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:56 pm  

Matt23 wrote:

Tvoc and King Monkey are right. Outstanding spot by Ian Smith, well done the officials on that one. I'd argue with KM though that Webb is offside until he gets behind the play the ball. I don't buy any of the 'attempting to get back' business. You're either offside or you're not. Webb was out of the play, until the next play the ball, which he would have been able to get behind.

I'm only using that because its the only explanation I have as to why others have gotten away with it.

: Sun Apr 12, 2009 6:33 pm  

FoxyRhino wrote: According to Robbie Paul's analysis on the SLS today, this was a new rule brought in at the beginning of this season (if so, I don't remember reading about it). This version is dated 2004 and has the "out of play" rule in so methinks Wobbie might be talking pap. http://www.therfl.co.uk/~therflc/clientdocs/rugby_laws_book_2004_.pdf

FoxyRhino wrote: According to Robbie Paul's analysis on the SLS today, this was a new rule brought in at the beginning of this season (if so, I don't remember reading about it). This version is dated 2004 and has the "out of play" rule in so methinks Wobbie might be talking pap. http://www.therfl.co.uk/~therflc/clientdocs/rugby_laws_book_2004_.pdf

: Sun Apr 12, 2009 6:36 pm  

King Monkey wrote:

I'm only using that because its the only explanation I have as to why others have gotten away with it.

It's pretty black and white in the rules, don't think making an effort comes into it, unless it's in a later version than the one I looked at.

Dunno though.

: Sun Apr 12, 2009 7:00 pm  

FearTheVee wrote:

It's pretty black and white in the rules, don't think making an effort comes into it, unless it's in a later version than the one I looked at.

Dunno though.

I dont think it is in the rules but would possibly show that refs interprete the rules to suit or even ignore some.