Juan Cornetto wrote:
I assume you did see the Wakefield v Leeds match then as you judged the Leeds players mistakes and poor form to be the fault of the Leeds coach and that he should resign as a result. So what specifically was it that you eye witnessed in the Leeds game that led you to deliver your comment on McDermott that couldn't be made against Smith because you didn't see the Warrington game?
My post after the shambles at Wakefield can be found on page 3 of this thread. The opening sentiment expressed there could have been repeated tonight as Leeds lost at home to an already relegated team for the 1st time since ..... ? And not just at Wakefield and tonight either but almost on a weekly basis since the Magic weekend.
I still cannot comment on a Warrington performance I did not see, did Tony Smith give some last minute boxing instructions to his most volatile player and smile broadly before his post match interview ?
The injury excuse you appear so fond of repeating at every opportunity is a all too predictable occupational hazard and one that needs to be overcome by the top clubs with the best squads and aren't Leeds fans always being told how this is their 'bestest ever assembled' or some such marketing inspired spin. Are Leeds really ever more afflicted than any other club in SL? Were Leeds more depleted when losing to St Helens in Round 7 ? When losing to Wigan in Round 13 ? When losing to Wakefield in Round 19 ?
Juan Cornetto wrote:
You were asked to provide a list of above average coaches to justify your claim that BM is "distinctly average"
You may have used the words "distinctly average" but in the context of your other comments (see below) rather indicated you were making out a case that he is below average
McDermott is as 'distinctly average' as his 1st grade coaching career suggests he is - how else would you describe a close to 50:50 return. As Leeds are one of the very best resourced clubs in SL why do they entrust the critical role in terms of on field performance to someone who struggles to add any value, someone who IMO will shortly be about as relevant to the modern game as his original mentor who at least still has some currency with the BBC.
McDermott arrived at Leeds promising flamboyant, attractive attacking rugby without being too concerned with completion rates. He's only consistently achieved the latter despite still having a quality group of rather talented players - when he's not turning them into 'nutters.' What's it going to be like in two years time if he's still in charge?
As long as McDermott fits the CEO's primary requirement (and as long as the turnstiles keep clicking) he'll no doubt cling-on but the standard overall is declining when it needs to improve and where is the throughput from the Academy these last four seasons? The majority of those promoted to 1st grade have failed to live up to any reputation they'd gathered along the way while Wigan's in particular look a quality apart but perhaps that's still a continuing legacy of employing a quality coach in 2010.