Ironically as a score line that’s not bad, but we wouldn’t win if we played for another week.
A month on and we still look entirely uncoached with and without the ball, a bit (not masses) more effort, but we look very poor without the ball, and worse with it.
To be fair to the coaches, you can't do much in terms of attack if all your halves and backs are injured. If it was just about attacking structure then there'd be no need to sign any players.
I think some are being a bit unfair, we never gave in, we lost our senior halfback for most of the game, that’s a lot of responsibility to put on a 17 year ild who imo outplayed Trueman.
We are incredibly dumb though, we could have won that and cas could have easily ran away with it.
I think some are being a bit unfair, we never gave in, we lost our senior halfback for most of the game, that’s a lot of responsibility to put on a 17 year ild who imo outplayed Trueman.
We are incredibly dumb though, we could have won that and cas could have easily ran away with it.
We need some players back sharpish.
Its concerning when a 17 year old already looks our best half, very mature performance from Sinfeild, good kicking passing (bar 1) and organiser, think he could gave got the best out of Austin if he had stayed on.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 166 guests
REPLY
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...
