: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:03 pm  

King Monkey wrote:

:lol:





So two mildly arrogant posts from 10 pages.

Well done.

I said a few (And there are 3 if you can count up to that many) and gave you proof of the arrogant comments as you asked.You've been owned pal now jog on

: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:25 pm  

knockersbumpMKII wrote:

I said a few (And there are 3 if you can count up to that many) and gave you proof of the arrogant comments as you asked.You've been owned pal now jog on

The third one's user name might suggest that he isn't a leeds fan though, if you pause and think hard about it.....

Out of interest, do you think the winner of Leeds v Saints will be favourites to win the competition? Will it still be arrogance if the bookies agree?

: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:36 pm  

knockersbumpMKII wrote:

yes actually: Raynor, Tony, Crocker(effectively missing) King, Whiting, Washbrook & Byrne. 4 of these having not played ANY games. Apart from Webb & blunderbus the rest have played have they not? Would you not say that you have ground out wins rather than won with great rugby? So yes very similar IMO

For crocker read world cup winner greg eastwood!!
So your comparing tony to webb??LMFAO!!!
Before sunday burrow had played 16 minutes.
Buderus played half a game.
Again very different scenario's in terms of quality missing and no i wouldn't say we've played great rugby but we have played winning rugby with plenty more to come!!

: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:50 pm  

knockersbumpMKII wrote:

yes actually: Raynor, Tony, Crocker(effectively missing) King, Whiting, Washbrook & Byrne. 4 of these having not played ANY games. Apart from Webb & blunderbus the rest have played have they not? Would you not say that you have ground out wins rather than won with great rugby? So yes very similar IMO

I can't wait till we lift that trophy. They might aswell start the engraving after Saints have been beat

: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:58 pm  

Gandy wrote:

I can't wait till we lift that trophy. They might aswell start the engraving after Saints have been beat

Challenge cup chokers sunshine. We'll dust you just like we did three times last season on dry tracks. You best pray for the rain pal.

: Tue Mar 10, 2009 3:00 pm  

St_Maca wrote:

Challenge cup chokers sunshine. We'll dust you just like we did three times last season on dry tracks. You best pray for the rain pal.

Are the Saints players scared of the rain?

: Tue Mar 10, 2009 3:02 pm  

St_Maca wrote:

Challenge cup chokers sunshine. We'll dust you just like we did three times last season on dry tracks. You best pray for the rain pal.

What was the excuse for 33-6 then?

: Tue Mar 10, 2009 3:02 pm  

Tony Soprano wrote:

Are the Saints players scared of the rain?

No but we don't perform to our entertainers tag. It simply means the other sides in SL including yourselves who simply aren't up to the skill levels of the S men have a chance of a surprise victory, against the odds as proved at OT in recent times.

: Tue Mar 10, 2009 3:04 pm  

St_Maca wrote:

No but we don't perform to our entertainers tag. It simply means the other sides in SL including yourselves who simply aren't up to the skill levels of the S men have a chance of a surprise victory, against the odds as proved at OT in recent times.

Your last two games have been entertaining for me.

: Tue Mar 10, 2009 3:05 pm  

I've said this before and I'll say it again. St Helens are nothing but a team who are still jelous of Wigans past success in a cup that does'nt matter anymore. Leeds are the champion performers of the days.