Re: McDermott : Sat Sep 10, 2016 11:00 am  

I've never been a part of Mac out. I'm still not.

Re: McDermott : Sat Sep 10, 2016 11:31 am  

If the end of season review McD harps on about is done honestly
then he should walk, no question. But you can see the long list of excuses being reeled out yet again and Gawy coming out with some bolox spin about the season being some kind of triumph over adversity.

Re: McDermott : Sat Sep 10, 2016 12:25 pm  

sgtwilko wrote:

I've never been a part of Mac out. I'm still not.

Which is fair enough mate. But you don't watch them, you are thousands of miles away. If you did, your opinion would most likely be different. So I hope you have a little understanding for those that are of that opinion.

Re: McDermott : Sat Sep 10, 2016 12:45 pm  

Mac OUT !!

He has shown this season that without Sinfield & Peacock , he is clueless. We are now playing very mediocre teams, and struggling to beat them.
The team have no structure, no line speed , no planned moves and last night he repeated his brainless tactic of not using 2 of our subs until the last 20 minutes. The man has lost it. The only thing that has saved him is the signing of a quality hooker., somrthing we have needed since Danny Buderas left us.
Last night against a plucky Batley team, we had pace to burn in the backs, but we did not have a clue how to use this advantage. The signings of crap players like Aichurch , Mullally , and Falloon are down to the coach, coupled with his failure to give any young forwards a
chance, despite the lack of form of experienced players.
The combination of sub standard players with a tactically inept coach can only have one outcome & and we have had to endure it all season.
Only a dramatic change of direction will prevent a repeat of this dross next season.

Re: McDermott : Sat Sep 10, 2016 1:10 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

Which is fair enough mate. But you don't watch them, you are thousands of miles away. If you did, your opinion would most likely be different. So I hope you have a little understanding for those that are of that opinion.

Total utter bull $hit. There is enough coverage of him, the team, the games for people who don't rock up to every game or even a single game to have a valid opinion. I have never got into tit for tat forum arguments with you.

But you are so wrong on this.

Coz you recon you're a die hard attendee your opinion is some how more valid?

With all due respect

F*ck off.

Re: McDermott : Sat Sep 10, 2016 1:20 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

Which is fair enough mate. But you don't watch them, you are thousands of miles away. If you did, your opinion would most likely be different. So I hope you have a little understanding for those that are of that opinion.

Most likely be different? I watch them live every week and I'm with Wilko.

Re: McDermott : Sat Sep 10, 2016 2:04 pm  

sgtwilko wrote:

Total utter bull $hit. There is enough coverage of him, the team, the games for people who don't rock up to every game or even a single game to have a valid opinion. I have never got into tit for tat forum arguments with you.

But you are so wrong on this.

Coz you recon you're a die hard attendee your opinion is some how more valid?

With all due respect

F*ck off.

I said your opinion was fair enough. Is there really any need for the foul mouthed childish response?

It has nothing to do with only attending can have an opinion. It is more to do with those that don't are more likely to be result driven, and as long as a win and a trophy along the way, al, good. You don't however put your money in your pocket and look for entertainment, hence the point made. I would put money the majority sharing your view do not attend regularly, but on the other hand those who do and season ticket holders, the majority will be the other way.

You are in Aus, you would know far more than me about the coaches and players there, and I respect that for what it is. So all I said, I would hope you would understand the opinions of others that differ from you.

Re: McDermott : Sat Sep 10, 2016 2:24 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

I said your opinion was fair enough. Is there really any need for the foul mouthed childish response?

It has nothing to do with only attending can have an opinion. It is more to do with those that don't are more likely to be result driven, and as long as a win and a trophy along the way, al, good. You don't however put your money in your pocket and look for entertainment, hence the point made. I would put money the majority sharing your view do not attend regularly, but on the other hand those who do and season ticket holders, the majority will be the other way.

You are in Aus, you would know far more than me about the coaches and players there, and I respect that for what it is. So all I said, I would hope you would understand the opinions of others that differ from you.

So if you stopped going to games and watched the games solely on tv you admit you'd be wanting McDermott to stay?

Re: McDermott : Sat Sep 10, 2016 2:38 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

So if you stopped going to games and watched the games solely on tv you admit you'd be wanting McDermott to stay?

No, I am clear I don't want him here. I am just saying the majority that regularly attend will want him out, and hoped the said poster would respect their opinion too.

Re: McDermott : Sat Sep 10, 2016 2:49 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

No, I am clear I don't want him here. I am just saying the majority that regularly attend will want him out, and hoped the said poster would respect their opinion too.

He didn't disrespect their opinion though did he. He simply said he didn't want McDermott out. You then disrespected his opinion by basing it on his location/attendance and nothing else.