Re: McDermott : Sat Sep 10, 2016 2:59 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

He didn't disrespect their opinion though did he. He simply said he didn't want McDermott out. You then disrespected his opinion by basing it on his location/attendance and nothing else.

What this bloke said.

Re: McDermott : Sat Sep 10, 2016 3:03 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

So if you stopped going to games and watched the games solely on tv you admit you'd be wanting McDermott to stay?

If I may just interrupt your bickering, the above question is inane at best. Who on this thread has claimed mutual exclusivity of the two events?

Re: McDermott : Sat Sep 10, 2016 3:12 pm  

son of headingley wrote:

If I may just interrupt your bickering, the above question is inane at best. Who on this thread has claimed mutual exclusivity of the two events?

Gotcha was the one claiming that people's view on McDermott in or out is linked to their attendance.

Re: McDermott : Sat Sep 10, 2016 3:20 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

He didn't disrespect their opinion though did he. He simply said he didn't want McDermott out. You then disrespected his opinion by basing it on his location/attendance and nothing else.

On what planet is saying his opinion is fair enough but hope he understands the opinion of the other side, in anyway disrespecting him? I even gave a simple reasoning for his opinion, based on not been around here each week. Dear me, you do scrape the bottom of barrels with you bickering Printer. Only one poster came with a foul mouthed tirade.

Re: McDermott : Sat Sep 10, 2016 3:41 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

On what planet is saying his opinion is fair enough but hope he understands the opinion of the other side, in anyway disrespecting him? I even gave a simple reasoning for his opinion, based on not been around here each week. Dear me, you do scrape the bottom of barrels with you bickering Printer. Only one poster came with a foul mouthed tirade.

You did give a simple reasoning for his opinion.....one that you can't seem to see could be disrespectful, and even told him his opinion would probably be different and exactly like yours if he attended games like you....you have zero evidence of that claim. If you can't see disrespectful that could be then you really have too high an opinion of your opinion.

That you started you post with the "opinion is fair enough...." Is no different to when people say "no offence intended" and proceed to say something offensive.

Re: McDermott : Sat Sep 10, 2016 3:47 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

You did give a simple reasoning for his opinion.....one that you can't seem to see could be disrespectful, and even told him his opinion would probably be different and exactly like yours if he attended games like you....you have zero evidence of that claim. If you can't see disrespectful that could be then you really have too high an opinion of your opinion.

That you started you post with the "opinion is fair enough...." Is no different to when people say "no offence intended" and proceed to say something offensive.

I said nothing about my opinion, again as usual with your bickering you make things up. Usual ploy of someone with nothing true to say. I clearly said the opinion of the majority who regularly attend, not me, and not all. Hence there is clearly no disrespect. The only disrespect was the response, which not surprisingly you seem happy to ignore.

Re: McDermott : Sat Sep 10, 2016 4:03 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

I said nothing about my opinion, again as usual with your bickering you make things up. Usual ploy of someone with nothing true to say. I clearly said the opinion of the majority who regularly attend, not me, and not all. Hence there is clearly no disrespect. The only disrespect was the response, which not surprisingly you seem happy to ignore.

The majority? There's over 10,000+ attend games and you're going sit here and say you know their opinion?

It's only your opinion that it is the majority. It's only your opinion other people's opinions are based on attendance. It's only your opinion that his opinion would be different if he attended games.

Oh yes he wrote two swear words in his reply, what a big bad guy. Do you get offended at games when you hear supporters shouting swear words at games especially anything along the lines of "F**k off McDermott you're sh*te!"???

You can't seem to see what you wrote provoked that response.

Re: McDermott : Sat Sep 10, 2016 4:10 pm  

Gotcha, you said to me " you don't watch them" because of my geographical location? and went on to say if I attended games I would "likley have the same opinion as you"?

I cannot get how you can't see how much BS that is based on content available across multi platforms.

It's arrogant and disrespectful to talk such nonsense. Then in another post suggested it's because those who watch on TV don't part with their hard earned like those going to games? When did Sky or Fox become free? Another nonsense statement from you.

I will just say for the record I flew back from Aus for the weekend for the 2015 GF to see Kev and JP one last time for Leeds. I spent more on that trip than you will on season tickets in plenty of years.

So is my opinion more valid than those who watched on TV? Is it balls.

Re: McDermott : Sat Sep 10, 2016 4:23 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

Only one poster came with a foul mouthed tirade.

Im from LS15 mate and now reside on the Central Coast. That's not a foul mouthed tirade in either of those locations.

You will need a thicker skin if we are ever gone have a pint.

Re: McDermott : Sat Sep 10, 2016 4:28 pm  

Get a room boys this is embarrassing from both sides

To take it back to on topic. I'm in the OUT camp purely down to the fact I think we are due a new voice in the changing room with new ideas