Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Fri Aug 29, 2014 10:49 pm  

Its rugby league not strictly come dancing. Second guessing what one player may have said to another on the field of play. good grief, it makes me wonder why I bother watching the game anymore

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Fri Aug 29, 2014 11:09 pm  

he is still a twaat, doesn't attack any tough buggers, just does the verbals. HE IS A C*&T

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Fri Aug 29, 2014 11:11 pm  

Terry i think you need a padded cell

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Fri Aug 29, 2014 11:12 pm  

terrykelly wrote:

he is still a twaat, doesn't attack any tough buggers, just does the verbals. HE IS A C*&T

Classy.

Are you a widnes fan by any chance? You would fit right in.

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:03 am  

It was worse what he said to child as child is actually gay. Tonight was more a heated comment in battle. Wrong person wrong comment wrong time.

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:05 am  

The Yellow Giraffe wrote:

Haha. I love this. Several fans comment on it and you single me out.

Hardaker is a great player but he clearly has occasional lapses in concentration. He has made a silly comment tonight that may or may not get get him in bother. I personally think it should. We don't have to agree but nor do we need to be immature and argumentative about it.

I singled you out because of the Chris Hill thread where you once again tried to make something of nothing...

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:08 am  

terrykelly wrote:

he is still a twaat, doesn't attack any tough buggers, just does the verbals. HE IS A C*&T

Calm down big dog

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Sat Aug 30, 2014 4:03 am  

MattyLeeds wrote:

I singled you out because of the Chris Hill thread where you once again tried to make something of nothing...

I didn't try and do anything. I gave my opinion on something that happened, as did many others. I did it fairly and honestly.

People like you seem to want to pick fights with people simply for having a different opinion. There is a huge chasm between agreeing with someone and arguing with them. It's called reasoned debate, you should try it.

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Sat Aug 30, 2014 6:44 am  

The Yellow Giraffe wrote:

I didn't try and do anything. I gave my opinion on something that happened, as did many others. I did it fairly and honestly.

People like you seem to want to pick fights with people simply for having a different opinion. There is a huge chasm between agreeing with someone and arguing with them. It's called reasoned debate, you should try it.

If you were up for "reasonable debate" you would have ignored the Hill pictures from 2 SEPERATE incidents which the 2nd rate Photographer was using to fire up a reaction.
It was revealed very early on the black eye was from a different incident and video evidence even in slow motion proved beyond doubt the contact was for only a split second and accidental.

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Sat Aug 30, 2014 7:05 am  

kingcobra wrote:

Oh dear - he's at it again - live on sky again.
In another fit of temper, blows a kiss and CLEARLY calls the saints player a f***ing p*ff

This kid is either just stupid, or very homophobic, over to you RFL

Observation A

A player bends the limb of an opponent deliberately trying to place undue pressure on a joint. The opponent jumps up and berates the offending player for trying to do him some serious harm. Rrse holes who do not support the team for whom the injured party plays, are more interested in the reaction of the injured party. That makes sense. No really.

Have you ever heard the term "sticks and stones"?

Observation B

The National Lip Reading Association are out in force.