Re: Ferres to Roosters falls through. : Thu Dec 24, 2015 9:44 am
Andy Gilder wrote:
Huddersfield's liability on Ferres isn't going to be four years salary though is it? If he doesn't move at some point during this season, he'll definitely go before the next one starts because teams will make space for him.
So at the very worst, Huddersfield's liability on it is one year's basic wages with no appearance, win or try bonuses. They're not as over a barrel as some seem to think they are.
So at the very worst, Huddersfield's liability on it is one year's basic wages with no appearance, win or try bonuses. They're not as over a barrel as some seem to think they are.
I'm no specialist on employment law here but I wonder what Huddersfields position would be if Ferres stayed for 2016. Would they have to play him? I'd imagine they'd have to have him train in some fashion even if it's not with the other players. I'm just thinking constructive dismissal-wise.