Chris28 wrote: But the charge could be seen that his "character, conduct or assocations" would be such to suggest that his presence here is not conducive to the public good. http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/policyandlaw/immigrationlaw/immigrationrules/part9/ See paragraph 320 (19) So much for innocent until proven guilty, eh? I'm not defending Bird or the Bulls but you can see why they and the RFL had reason to assume he would be treated differently having no actual convictions. |
Chris28 wrote: But the charge could be seen that his "character, conduct or assocations" would be such to suggest that his presence here is not conducive to the public good. http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/policyandlaw/immigrationlaw/immigrationrules/part9/ See paragraph 320 (19) So much for innocent until proven guilty, eh? I'm not defending Bird or the Bulls but you can see why they and the RFL had reason to assume he would be treated differently having no actual convictions. |
|