: Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:23 pm  

McLaren_Field wrote:

The real question that has not yet been answered by Doncaster but which will undoubtably be asked by any RFL enquiry is why, when an all-seater ground is involved, when Queens were sent a batch of tickets to purchase, why were opposition fans allowed to take up positions in that section ?

Thats the question that was on the lips of all the Queens supporters after the troublemakers appeared in their section, a section that included many women and children and indeed the young baby of one of the Queens players, and one that conveniently seems to have been ignored by Donny at the moment.

Lets get it right, the Keepmoat is not segregated for Rugby League games and the Doncaster supporters where already there before the Queens morons came out of the bar.

Funnily enough that section also included the Doncaster’s captains wife, two small children and father-in-law.

Must also add that Andy Wilson said he did not know the morons.

: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:42 pm  

Marshland wrote:

Lets get it right, the Keepmoat is not segregated for Rugby League games and the Doncaster supporters where already there before the Queens morons came out of the bar.

Funnily enough that section also included the Doncaster’s captains wife, two small children and father-in-law.

Must also add that Andy Wilson said he did not know the morons.

Whoever and whatever, the main reason for moving the game to the Keepmoat was security and H&S issues, it would appear that no regard for either of these two issues was made, Doncaster have some serious questions to answer for allowing the situation to progress unhindered as it did, hence the reason for the RFL not simply awarding the tie to the leading team at the abandonment as they could have done at 63 minutes.

: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:56 pm  

Interesting to see McField cast in the role of apologist here

: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:57 pm  

Charmless Nerk wrote:

Interesting to see McField cast in the role of apologist here

I have contacts, all is never as it seems oh small one

: Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:01 pm  

McLaren_Field wrote:

I have contacts, all is never as it seems oh small one

I've heard it said that you lack specs appeal, big man

: Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:09 pm  

Charmless Nerk wrote:

I've heard it said that you lack specs appeal, big man

I'll have you know I look like a secret agent in my special "driving glasses" with the react-o-light lenses.

The optician didn't explain that they don't react-o-light inside a car did he, bas'tad

: Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:14 pm  

McLaren_Field wrote:

I'll have you know I look like a secret agent in my special "driving glasses" with the react-o-light lenses.

The optician didn't explain that they don't react-o-light inside a car did he, bas'tad

UV sensitive rather than photo-sensitive are they?

: Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:21 pm  

El Diablo wrote:

UV sensitive rather than photo-sensitive are they?

Aye

: Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:31 pm  

Going to be on look north in a minute

: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:05 am  

McLaren_Field wrote:

The real question that has not yet been answered by Doncaster but which will undoubtably be asked by any RFL enquiry is why, when an all-seater ground is involved, when Queens were sent a batch of tickets to purchase, why were opposition fans allowed to take up positions in that section ?

Thats the question that was on the lips of all the Queens supporters after the troublemakers appeared in their section, a section that included many women and children and indeed the young baby of one of the Queens players, and one that conveniently seems to have been ignored by Donny at the moment.

Rugby League doesn't do segregation remember? If indeed there were Donny trouble causers in the middle of that lot, they want their heads testing. If there were racist comments made, or any form of trouble coming from the Donny side of things, I'm not sure it warrants a riot to be honest, especially not the attacking of stewards and police.