: Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:18 pm  

Brough often looks good, but I'm starting to get the feeling he can be a bit of a lightweight at times when games are tight and hard. probably playing for a club that has lower expectations (no offence) it doesn't get held against him because of all the good he can do, but I wonder if he'd be found lacking for a top club.

I liken him to Briers in this sense.

: Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:25 pm  

G1 wrote: He said "Sniff the Camel Toe" but Sky edited it for family viewing. Still my favourite interweb video Well my favourite legal one at least

G1 wrote: He said "Sniff the Camel Toe" but Sky edited it for family viewing. Still my favourite interweb video Well my favourite legal one at least

: Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:36 pm  

in answer to the opening post, I don't think he would come to Leeds as a backup to 7&9, and he wasn't available 12 months ago when we signed Buderus.

He does seem a player that is very up and down. he was key to the Hull team in 2005, but was out of Hull quite soon afterwards.

Looks like a t!t too

: Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:42 pm  

leicester_rhino wrote:

He does seem a player that is very up and down. he was key to the Hull team in 2005, but was out of Hull quite soon afterwards.

He's been at a few clubs in a relatively short space of time, which often tells you enough about the person, rather than the player.

Decent enough player, but I don't see the point in splashing the cash on him, as I don't think he offers cover in positions we're even remotely weak

: Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:51 pm  

Lord_Percy wrote:

I don't see the point in splashing the cash on him, as I don't think he offers cover in positions we're even remotely weak

McClennan obviosuly felt differently.

EmmaMur01 would love Danny Brough to play for Leeds.

: Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:57 pm  

King Monkey wrote:

McClennan obviosuly felt differently.

???

Am I missing something there?

: Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:58 pm  

Lord_Percy wrote:

???

Am I missing something there?

He signed a hooker? Buderus!

: Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:59 pm  

wouldn't want him at leeds, he is a disruptive influence in the dressing room, hence his depature from hull. he has decent kicking game but certainly no better than anything we already have at leeds

: Fri Apr 03, 2009 1:00 pm  

King Monkey wrote:

He signed a hooker? Buderus!

Ah right, with you.

My comment was based on the fact he was a potential sigining, i.e. adding to the squad with Buderus already in it. If we hadn't have signed Buderus then he could have been an option, but even then I don't think he'd have come to Leeds as a back-up.

: Fri Apr 03, 2009 1:02 pm  

King Monkey wrote:

McClennan obviosuly felt differently.

EmmaMur01 would love Danny Brough to play for Leeds.

I feel for yer mate