Re: thank god our kit doesnt look as bad as this : Fri Nov 19, 2010 1:42 am  

McLaren_Field wrote:

This could be the funniest season since Bradford decided to produce all their replica shirts in "skinfit"

I'm sure that shirt was designed by a bloody Loiner.

Was a damn good job I was a lot slimmer in those days. Was like wearing a sodding corset as it was - heaven knows how I would have squeezed into one now. You have no idea how fortunate you were not having to suffer a shirt like that. They had to come down the terraces at Odsal with Oxygen.

Re: thank god our kit doesnt look as bad as this : Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:27 am  

Adeybull wrote:

I'm sure that shirt was designed by a bloody Loiner.

Was a damn good job I was a lot slimmer in those days. Was like wearing a sodding corset as it was - heaven knows how I would have squeezed into one now. You have no idea how fortunate you were not having to suffer a shirt like that. They had to come down the terraces at Odsal with Oxygen.

I have in my wardrobe a pristine Newcastle Falcons shirt which I bought in my size one year only to realise that they'd left some of the cloth out when I got it home - its the only explanation that I can think of given that the shirt actually narrows considerably at the waist so that only the malformed could possibly wear it.

Re: thank god our kit doesnt look as bad as this : Sun Nov 21, 2010 10:02 am  

Not even close to the worst shirt design EVER!

Not even close to the worst shirt design EVER!

Re: thank god our kit doesnt look as bad as this : Sun Nov 21, 2010 10:44 am  

Keith Swiftcorn wrote: Not even close to the worst shirt design EVER! Agreed. that shirt was heinous

Keith Swiftcorn wrote: Not even close to the worst shirt design EVER! Agreed. that shirt was heinous

Re: thank god our kit doesnt look as bad as this : Sun Nov 21, 2010 5:28 pm  

McLaren_Field wrote:

This could be the funniest season since Bradford decided to produce all their replica shirts in "skinfit"

When did we do that? Wouldn't mind a better fitting shirt, the kooga ones are horrible.

Re: thank god our kit doesnt look as bad as this : Sun Nov 21, 2010 6:22 pm  

chpntpsr wrote:

When did we do that? Wouldn't mind a better fitting shirt, the kooga ones are horrible.

Pull it tight around the back and then get a female to stitch you into it - most Bulls fans are permanently stitched into their shirts judging by the amount you see in supermarkets and The White Rose Centre.

They've been stitched into them since 2005 apparently.

Re: thank god our kit doesnt look as bad as this : Sun Nov 21, 2010 6:50 pm  

McLaren_Field wrote:

Pull it tight around the back and then get a female to stitch you into it - most Bulls fans are permanently stitched into their shirts judging by the amount you see in supermarkets and The White Rose Centre.

I'll stick with my XS Australia shirt, perfectly fitted.

Could say the same about Leeds fans being permanently stitched into their Blue and Amber when shopping in Leeds city centre.

Personally the only time I wear my shirt is for matches or at home.

Re: thank god our kit doesnt look as bad as this : Mon Nov 22, 2010 10:45 am  

Keith Swiftcorn wrote: Not even close to the worst shirt design EVER! I don't even need to look at the picture to know that it's going to be a Leeds one

Keith Swiftcorn wrote: Not even close to the worst shirt design EVER! I don't even need to look at the picture to know that it's going to be a Leeds one

[Ex-Swarcliffe Rhino]

Re: thank god our kit doesnt look as bad as this : Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:09 am  

Clearwing wrote:

I don't even need to look at the picture to know that it's going to be a Leeds one

You too? 2 months back and he's allready re-hashing old material you say? How the mighty have fallen

[Wheels]

Re: thank god our kit doesnt look as bad as this : Fri Nov 26, 2010 12:52 pm  

Erm, York's new jersey... giggidy.