If we are picking on form why is Burrow in the squad, and senior even on the bench.
I appreciate that, honestly I do, and in full agreement with you. But unfortunately, we have no other option for scrum half until McGuire is back, and allthough I don't like It I think it is better to have a sub option that can play backs and forwards if necessary.
I appreciate that, honestly I do, and in full agreement with you. But unfortunately, we have no other option for scrum half until McGuire is back, and allthough I don't like It I think it is better to have a sub option that can play backs and forwards if necessary.
Sadly I agree on Burrow I though that as i was typing, there is no other option. On senior I would not put senior though, as if needed ablett, can nove to centre and webb can also move to backs and sinfield move to stand off?
Problem is if you dropped the players that were delivering the required level of performance then you would struggle to put a side out.
I would go with this Webb - his passing is too suspect to play in the halves Watkins Ablett Senior - only because I don't see a viable option on the other wing if Watkins moves - Smith will not play Hall Sinfield Burrow - sadly Burgess Buderus Cross - he needs to start and get his work rate up Delanney - hopefully his holiday is over - Mrs Burgess must be worn out by now Clarkson JJB
Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.
I'd be a little more ruthless, even if it means blooding players from the U20s ahead of when you'd maybe want to. If McDermott rollls out the same 17 again after his post-match comments then he's a lame duck with the players IMO.
I'd be a little more ruthless, even if it means blooding players from the U20s ahead of when you'd maybe want to. If McDermott rollls out the same 17 again after his post-match comments then he's a lame duck with the players IMO.
I'm not sure what Clarkson offers, whether you play him from the start or off the bench.
Doesn't dominate collisions either with or without the ball, doesn't have an offload game or quick feet. Needs to kick on and show that having a full-time contract is improving his game because I'm not seeing it at the moment.
I'm not sure what Clarkson offers, whether you play him from the start or off the bench.
Doesn't dominate collisions either with or without the ball, doesn't have an offload game or quick feet. Needs to kick on and show that having a full-time contract is improving his game because I'm not seeing it at the moment.
He has an eye for the try line brings much more enthusiasm in defence than many established stars imo and whilst i agree there are things he needs to improve i don't think he deserves to be cut.