Re: RD 23 | Hull Kingston Rovers (A) : Mon Aug 08, 2022 1:46 pm  

Frosties. wrote:

Fusitua 2 match, Sezer 2 match and Martin 1 match suspension

No way can they be 2 match bans

Re: RD 23 | Hull Kingston Rovers (A) : Mon Aug 08, 2022 1:48 pm  

YosemiteSam wrote:

Rhyse Martin (Leeds) – Grade A Dangerous Contact – 1 Match Penalty Notice

No idea what this was for.

And yet...
Frankie Halton (Hull KR) – Grade A Dangerous Contact – 0 Match Penalty Notice
Jordan Lane (Hull FC) – Grade A Dangerous Contact – 0 Match Penalty Notice

No, me neither.

I've said for a few weeks I think there is a conscious or uncocious bias at the disciplinary against us

Re: RD 23 | Hull Kingston Rovers (A) : Mon Aug 08, 2022 1:52 pm  

rugbyleague88 wrote:

Presume Martin has been charged previously without receiving a ban hence why he gets a ban this time?

Seems a bit harsh the Fussy one. Clearly had raced in for a ball and all challenge as there was an overlap. Salford player fell into him as he made contact. No intent or malice and pretty unfortunate for me. If it was worthy of a ban then would match should have been more than sufficient.

I think that’s what’s done Fus to be honest, he’s had a couple of those borderline I seem to remember when shooting in (maybe even one in the Boxing Day game) and not picked up a ban until now.

Re: RD 23 | Hull Kingston Rovers (A) : Mon Aug 08, 2022 2:21 pm  

Barrie’s Glass Eye wrote:

I think that’s what’s done Fus to be honest, he’s had a couple of those borderline I seem to remember when shooting in (maybe even one in the Boxing Day game) and not picked up a ban until now.

Looking at the footage again I can’t see how its a ban let alone a 2 game one.

Re: RD 23 | Hull Kingston Rovers (A) : Mon Aug 08, 2022 4:01 pm  

Barrie’s Glass Eye wrote:

I think that’s what’s done Fus to be honest, he’s had a couple of those borderline I seem to remember when shooting in (maybe even one in the Boxing Day game) and not picked up a ban until now.

ahhh yes, the old 'his perfect disciplinary record goes against him'?

Re: RD 23 | Hull Kingston Rovers (A) : Mon Aug 08, 2022 4:14 pm  

christopher wrote:

Looking at the footage again I can’t see how its a ban let alone a 2 game one.

It'll have been deemed late. Which in fairness it is, albeit marginally.

Re: RD 23 | Hull Kingston Rovers (A) : Mon Aug 08, 2022 4:19 pm  

Clearwing wrote:

It'll have been deemed late. Which in fairness it is, albeit marginally.

except its not a late hit, its been deemed a grade C high tackle by the rfl, so whats the excuse now?

Re: RD 23 | Hull Kingston Rovers (A) : Mon Aug 08, 2022 4:26 pm  

You would think the RFL would be trying to attract crowds, not ban players for trivial accidents in a contact sport!

Re: RD 23 | Hull Kingston Rovers (A) : Mon Aug 08, 2022 4:52 pm  

Neruda wrote:

except its not a late hit, its been deemed a grade C high tackle by the rfl, so whats the excuse now?

In that case I'm baffled.

Re: RD 23 | Hull Kingston Rovers (A) : Mon Aug 08, 2022 5:52 pm  

The Korbin Sims 2 match ban for us is even more laughable than the Fusitua talk . What this sport is turning into is unrecognizable from when I first watched it. As if injuries arent a problem in itself these days they pile on ludicrous bans on top. The paying speccy barely sees two full strength teams go head to head nowadays