Re: Hull FC.... : Sat Apr 16, 2016 2:26 pm  

Charlie Sheen wrote:

I thought Garbutt, and Mullally were immense yesterday, Garbutt was also immense against Salford too.

Garbutt was very good. Mullally was awful, and can't believe the stick Achurch is getting comparison. Although one good thing of Mullally he gets down and up quickly for a play the ball.

Re: Hull FC.... : Sat Apr 16, 2016 2:45 pm  

As usual on here it either has to be from one extreme to the other.

Mullally was neither immense nor awful. He had an ok game, some good stuff and some stuff to work on. Coming into the season around 4th/5th prop he's doing a decent job and signs he can improve further with more games and experience. At 24 he's still quite young in prop terms and only has roughly around the same amount of SL games as Sutcliffe under his belt.

Re: Hull FC.... : Sat Apr 16, 2016 3:02 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

As usual on here it either has to be from one extreme to the other.

Mullally was neither immense nor awful. He had an ok game, some good stuff and some stuff to work on. Coming into the season around 4th/5th prop he's doing a decent job and signs he can improve further with more games and experience. At 24 he's still quite young in prop terms and only has roughly around the same amount of SL games as Sutcliffe under his belt.

i agree he was decent and did as well as you would expect for a player we bought as a project really.

On Achurch, he gets stick because he is paid big money and still fails to deliver big performances.He actually wasn't terrible to be fair last night but the one off load aside, was no more than average again.

Re: Hull FC.... : Sat Apr 16, 2016 3:16 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

As usual on here it either has to be from one extreme to the other.

Mullally was neither immense nor awful. He had an ok game, some good stuff and some stuff to work on. Coming into the season around 4th/5th prop he's doing a decent job and signs he can improve further with more games and experience. At 24 he's still quite young in prop terms and only has roughly around the same amount of SL games as Sutcliffe under his belt.

That is because it is s message board, of opinions, and your opinion is no more right than anyone else's, no matter how much you want to think it is.

On the season you are correct, but the posts were about last night, about last night only, so why does a point about the season come in to it.

Re: Hull FC.... : Sat Apr 16, 2016 3:23 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

That is because it is s message board, of opinions, and your opinion is no more right than anyone else's, no matter how much you want to think it is.

Didn't say it was more right did I? Or shall I ask you to quote me saying that as you love asking that? I gave my opinion that people go to extremes when judging players performances.....now untwist your knickers Mr Sensitive because as we know on here when it comes to someone thinking his opinion is more right or near as dammit a fact then you take the biscuit.

Gotcha wrote:

On the season you are correct, but the posts were about last night, about last night only, so why does a point about the season come in to it.

It's a message board, I didn't realise that after commenting on his performance last night that I couldn't extend my view on how he's gone on so far in the season. Or do I need your permission to do that?

Re: Hull FC.... : Sat Apr 16, 2016 3:36 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

Didn't say it was more right did I? Or shall I ask you to quote me saying that as you love asking that? I gave my opinion that people go to extremes when judging players performances.....now untwist your knickers Mr Sensitive because as we know on here when it comes to someone thinking his opinion is more right or near as dammit a fact then you take the biscuit.

It's a message board, I didn't realise that after commenting on his performance last night that I couldn't extend my view on how he's gone on so far in the season. Or do I need your permission to do that?

Oops! Here we go again. More 'handbags'

Re: Hull FC.... : Sat Apr 16, 2016 3:54 pm  

nantwichexile wrote:

Oops! Here we go again. More 'handbags'

At least we're discussing rugby on a rugby forum, and not talking about our building of children toys AirFix models.

Re: Hull FC.... : Sat Apr 16, 2016 3:57 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

At least we're discussing rugby on a rugby forum, and not talking about our building of children toys AirFix models.

You could have fooled me ....

Hornby will be thinking "if only" ..... those halcyon, profitable days are long gone.

Re: Hull FC.... : Sat Apr 16, 2016 4:05 pm  

nantwichexile wrote:

You could have fooled me ....

Wouldn't take much, just a sensible comment of rugby usually does the trick. Like you being flabbergasted at the thought of signing a proven Kiwi international in Leuluai but continually asking for Golding to play HB even though you've never see him play there.

Are you going to play with your train set, scalextrics or action man figures tonight?

Re: Hull FC.... : Sat Apr 16, 2016 4:18 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

Wouldn't take much, just a sensible comment of rugby usually does the trick. Like you being flabbergasted at the thought of signing a proven Kiwi international in Leuluai but continually asking for Golding to play HB even though you've never see him play there.

Are you going to play with your train set, scalextrics or action man figures tonight?

Leuluai would be a desperation signing ...Leeds should be looking to do much better. Golding is worth a shot at HB, IMO...that's all. Just an opinion.

I don't have a train set, scalextric or action man...but if you fancy joining me for a game of crossfire I could make a place for you....if you promise to leave your handbag at home