Re: Joe Westerman : Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:09 am  

£150K?!!

That's just totally nuts - he's not worth half of that.

Re: Joe Westerman : Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:50 am  

Frosties. wrote:

For anyone thinking, yes I got it from the same source that told me Brierley has a deal with Leeds.

Was that the source who told you we'd be getting him if Leigh didn't get promoted?
Or the source who said we'd get him on loan?
Or the source that told you Ellis had signed for us from Wests?

Re: Joe Westerman : Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:52 am  

krisleeds wrote:

£150K?!!

That's just totally nuts - he's not worth half of that.

Yeah but he's doubling up as a chauffeur remember.

I wonder if Westerman suffers a broken leg or serious knee injury, could we get Clark on loan for a few months until Westerman is able to drive again?

Re: Joe Westerman : Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:56 am  

Is he worth a third of a stuart fielden?

[Frosties.]

Re: Joe Westerman : Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:04 am  

ThePrinter wrote:

Was that the source who told you we'd be getting him if Leigh didn't get promoted?
Or the source who said we'd get him on loan?
Or the source that told you Ellis had signed for us from Wests?

Yet bringing the past up again. As previously stated, Ellis was as good as done with Leeds.
I never said we'd get Brierley on loan? But he is going on loan to Leigh next season and joining Leeds in 2017.

Has it not proved correct with Westerman? There you go.

Re: Joe Westerman : Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:05 am  

How much space must we have left on the cap to be even thinking of signing Clark westerman and burgess.

Re: Joe Westerman : Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:06 am  

Juan Cornetto wrote:

You still fail to see or acknowledge that you have been critical and disrespectful to the Leeds club and management which was a point that I posted before which you chose to ignore. In it I pointed out that you specifically accused the club of being unprofessional. You also used emotive phrases which implied fault and bad faith on the part of the club eg "pull out" "proclaims to look after players", "false promises" , "Leeds telling players something that was not the case" and you even had the arrogance to justify your criticism by saying you were "making a moral point"

Therefore I have read your posts carefully and the above comments are not an assumption but black and white evidence that you were being critical of the club. You did not make clear you were passing on a one sided version of events that could be open to question. Indeed sound judgement would have led you to question what you had been told before posting. Had you done this you would have seen that Leeds had offered terms that were subject to contract.

You also stated that "I only know the Leeds position" when you couldn't have done as you did not speak to the Leeds negotiators first hand.

He's also failed to address that if Clark knew the deal couldn't be completed until Warrington found a replacement (which they never did)......how can the blame be placed at Leeds' door? That was the one part of the deal they had zero control over.

Re: Joe Westerman : Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:07 am  

The Eagle wrote:

Is he worth a third of a stuart fielden?

Pre or post Mason effect?

Re: Joe Westerman : Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:08 am  

SmokeyTA wrote:

How much space must we have left on the cap to be even thinking of signing Clark westerman and burgess.

Plenty by all accounts.... Enough space to sign a 'marquee' player but not use the official marquee slot...

Re: Joe Westerman : Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:09 am  

Frosties. wrote:

Yet bringing the past up again. As previously stated, Ellis was as good as done with Leeds.
I never said we'd get Brierley on loan? But he is going on loan to Leigh next season and joining Leeds in 2017.

Has it not proved correct with Westerman? There you go.

Has it not proved wrong that Brierley hasn't joined us for 2016 when Leigh failed to get promotion. A suggestion I said would be wrong
The good thing with people who spread these rumours though is that they just shift goalposts or come up with some excuse as to why it didn't happen instead of just admitting it was incorrect.