Re: Hardaker : Thu Nov 03, 2016 11:08 am
Old Feller wrote:
I think your first line should have read "deregister"
It's not as simple as that, if we deregister Hardaker he is still under contract to us so his salary must count against the cap. If we don't pay him then I think he would sue us for breach of contract unless we can concoct sufficient grounds to dismiss him.
It's not as simple as that, if we deregister Hardaker he is still under contract to us so his salary must count against the cap. If we don't pay him then I think he would sue us for breach of contract unless we can concoct sufficient grounds to dismiss him.
I doubt there would be any need to concoct anything to be fair. Give Zak enough rope and he will always hang himself.