Re: SLQ 7 - Leigh Centurions H. : Sat Sep 24, 2016 12:13 pm  

Leeds were playing on a 4 day turnaround with a bench of youngsters who only played small minutes with a HB combination of a centre and a HB with a groin injury who couldn't kick goals. We put a guy on kicking duties who has never kicked before and cost us more points and we were just seeing out the final 20 mins in a match that was also a dead rubber for us.

Re: SLQ 7 - Leigh Centurions H. : Sat Sep 24, 2016 12:36 pm  

Ste100Centurions wrote:

Exactly Cokey

To only win at home by 25 for a reigning treble winning Champion team is poor. All this while playing a Championship team (currently) who played very poorly by their standards is poor & Leeds were no more than bang average for a Super Dooper League side.

Leigh were very disjointed, lacked respect of the ball (not clamping the ball in tackle) which allowed multiple offloads & metres gained, as did the needless penalties.

Lots of dropped ball & nonsense offloads from Leigh cost us big metres lost & the team as a whole looked farked, out on their feet from fairly early on in this game.

Lots of missed tackles & poor tackling technique combined with dropping off/retreating when Segeyaro & Moon ran at us created just the right conditions for Leeds to take an easy win, yet Leeds could have & should have run in 50+ but didn't, a measure of where Leeds are more than where Leigh are headed I feel.

7/8 confirmed departures for Leigh + maybe 1 or 2 more & 8 rumoured signings could change the outlook for Leighs survival in SL.

Well said Ste.

Re: Lee Smith : Sat Sep 24, 2016 1:36 pm  

He's put on abit of weight and played dirty.

Stop being such tarts.

Re: Lee Smith : Sat Sep 24, 2016 2:11 pm  

Bang wrote:

He's put on abit of weight and played dirty.

Stop being such tarts.

He caught Golding with a knee when he scored but Golding ran into him knee first into his gut (or lower) when running for a high kick just before.

Re: Lee Smith : Sat Sep 24, 2016 3:40 pm  

difference is goldings was totally accidental. I think smith just took the opportunity to get him back. no big deal that's rugby.

Re: SLQ 7 - Leigh Centurions H. : Sat Sep 24, 2016 4:04 pm  

Ste100Centurions wrote:

Exactly Cokey

To only win at home by 25 for a reigning treble winning Champion team is poor. All this while playing a Championship team (currently) who played very poorly by their standards is poor & Leeds were no more than bang average for a Super Dooper League side.

Leigh were very disjointed, lacked respect of the ball (not clamping the ball in tackle) which allowed multiple offloads & metres gained, as did the needless penalties.

Lots of dropped ball & nonsense offloads from Leigh cost us big metres lost & the team as a whole looked farked, out on their feet from fairly early on in this game.

Lots of missed tackles & poor tackling technique combined with dropping off/retreating when Segeyaro & Moon ran at us created just the right conditions for Leeds to take an easy win, yet Leeds could have & should have run in 50+ but didn't, a measure of where Leeds are more than where Leigh are headed I feel.

7/8 confirmed departures for Leigh + maybe 1 or 2 more & 8 rumoured signings could change the outlook for Leighs survival in SL.

If only life was that simple.

Re: Lee Smith : Sat Sep 24, 2016 4:50 pm  

tad rhino wrote:

difference is goldings was totally accidental. I think smith just took the opportunity to get him back. no big deal that's rugby.

Accidental in what way ? , he charged at the full back not looking at the ball , so what exactly did he think would occur ?

Re: Lee Smith : Sat Sep 24, 2016 4:58 pm  

he was looking above and behind him. looking for the ball.not once did he look at smith.

[Ex-Swarcliffe Rhino]

Re: SLQ 7 - Leigh Centurions H. : Sat Sep 24, 2016 6:26 pm  

Life is that simple when you are that simple.

#Banter

Re: SLQ 7 - Leigh Centurions H. : Sat Sep 24, 2016 6:34 pm  

I love Leigh fans they are now my special friends