: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:05 am
gulfcoast_highwayman wrote:
But so many bands have started very strongly (Killers, Arctics) but have pretty much failed to really kick on from there.
It may be the nature of the fractured music business. Long term crossover appeal is required for me if a band are to be mentioned in any discussion about 'defining band of the decade'. I just don't think any guitar band has really done that.
...recently.
Its a well known phenominum in the music business - band spend three or four years together living in each others pockets, writing songs and bumming gigs whenever and wherever - finally get noticed and signed for a one record deal at which point the publishers listen to the whole of their repetoire and pick the best 10 or 12 songs to make an album leaving behind the cr@p that they've written along the way.
Album is a best seller and suddenly the publishers are interested in another one, in the meantime said band have been on the road promoting to death and have not written anything new in the last twelve months due to gigging every night of the week - second album has a very short production cycle and as a result contains all the cr@p that was rejected for the first album.
Band splits shortly after second album is a flop.
The only ones who get five album deals are the ones who can demonstrate a huge catalogue of work at the first meeting.
PS - those "million dollar album deals" don't exist either