: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:11 pm  

Lets just hope they don't have phone sex!

: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:13 pm  

G1 wrote: BTW, speaking of Rogues Gallery I thought you might enjoy this pearl of wisdom he left on the Saints forum. It made me chuckle. It's sooooooooooooo unfair If I could watch something for an hour and a half and come to conclusions of that high standard I'd be qualified for "supersizing" fat kids in an Arndale centre somewhere. At least he made the comments in the appropriate location. If anyone appreciates delusion and denial it's the Stains.

G1 wrote: BTW, speaking of Rogues Gallery I thought you might enjoy this pearl of wisdom he left on the Saints forum. It made me chuckle. It's sooooooooooooo unfair If I could watch something for an hour and a half and come to conclusions of that high standard I'd be qualified for "supersizing" fat kids in an Arndale centre somewhere. At least he made the comments in the appropriate location. If anyone appreciates delusion and denial it's the Stains.

: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:14 pm  

DoubleAone wrote:

Skype

or webcam

He probably uses his mobile!

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:42 pm  

DISA wrote:

When people want to quote others, it really is pish poor trolling when they dont quote the full post. You only look silly when trying to look big when you miss things like this.




If you had have come back with somesomthing on that, then I would have accepted your comment.

leeds won't lose a game all season, but there are some exceptions.

You basically said a broad sweeping statement followed by a short contradictory statement. So either you don't agree with yourself *mental* or you didn't think about what you wrote. Either way you looked silly.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:54 pm  

LeedsPokerGuru wrote:

leeds won't lose a game all season, but there are some exceptions.

You basically said a broad sweeping statement followed by a short contradictory statement. So either you don't agree with yourself *mental* or you didn't think about what you wrote. Either way you looked silly.

Stop been a pedantic. You have been caught out a few times recently. Let it go.

I clearly said, " players made available mid season, are usually the ones not required anymore at their current clubs. This is not the quality we require. There are exceptions to this, but considering the lack of quality centres in the game, I doubt this would be one"

That bit was put in exactly to what you stated, Ali. Of course there is exceptions, but I covered that with the comment about lack of quality centres.

You failed to quote that bit, because you wanted to look big. You didn't.

Ridiculously you fail to see that on other posts my argument is not one of we should not sign, but one of we should not sign a centre "becoming available mid season". I would prefer to spend a transfer fee on someone identified to improve us, rather than a desperate signing because a player is available.

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:46 pm  

http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/spor ... 09,00.html Bulldogs recruit Greg Eastwood has denied he's overweight and is ready to play

http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/spor ... 09,00.html Bulldogs recruit Greg Eastwood has denied he's overweight and is ready to play

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 1:57 am  

Chaka wrote:

http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/sport/nrl/story/0,26746,25207607-5003409,00.html


Bulldogs recruit Greg Eastwood has denied he's overweight and is ready to play

Was never thrilled about the signing. Now it's off I bet all the rhinos yes men suddenly go off him or realise we never needed him.

GH could use the spare cap space to offer a few players bumper salaires paying them some of next years wages this year thus freeing up even more space next year. Has been a while since we opened the cheque book and signed a long term jigsaw piece(gaz ellis) who knows???

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:20 am  

Just a curious slant on the news - I heard a statement on Radio Leeds last night from Mr H. to the effect that Eastwood was "on loan" for a year to the Bulldogs. That news story (above) seems to suggest that we are the ones who will "borrow" him in 2010 if his criminal record can be overlooked ?

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:09 am  

LeedsPokerGuru wrote:

Now it's off ???

It's not though.

LeedsPokerGuru wrote:

GH could use the spare cap space to offer a few players bumper salaires paying them some of next years wages this year thus freeing up even more space next year.

Did Richie tell you to say that?

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:07 am  

LeedsPokerGuru wrote:

Was never thrilled about the signing. Now it's off I bet all the rhinos yes men suddenly go off him or realise we never needed him.

GH could use the spare cap space to offer a few players bumper salaires paying them some of next years wages this year thus freeing up even more space next year. Has been a while since we opened the cheque book and signed a long term jigsaw piece(gaz ellis) who knows???

But he wasn't in terms of squad strength just one signing.

I think people need to learn a bit more about the modern game rathern than just the game.

Leeds through Bluey and Hetherington made a big thing start of season about how we are working on quality in the squad this year rather than quantity, and that players will adapt to various postitions.

They further pointed out on signing Eastwood, that he had played Stand Off, Loose, and Second row for Brisbane last season, and that he could play centre and prop. They identified this signing as key because of his versatility and the need to play various positions.

Who in our current squad gives us the variety that Eastwood would have? only JJB comes close, and we already had him anyway.

This will be a huge loss to the plans of the club. Might not disrupt us to the competition on offer, only time will tell, but he is certainly a set back to Blueys plans.

You yourself say we need a centre, I personally think we are short at prop, others will point out somewhere else. Players who can play equally well in various positions can be invaluable, and worth two players on the rosta straight away.