Re: Segayaro : Sat Sep 10, 2016 5:46 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

We were talking about the league season only (LLS) not playoffs.

Aiton - 23
Cuthbertson - 3
Burrow - 2
Lilley - 1
R.Ward - 1

Total - 30

Aiton/R.Ward - w17 d1 l6
Burrow/Lilley/Cuthbertson - w2 l4

I think there is a difference between being named as 9 in the starting line up and actually playing the position. Cuthbertson never played hooker in any game for Leeds

Re: Segayaro : Sat Sep 10, 2016 5:55 pm  

Sal Paradise wrote:

I think there is a difference between being named as 9 in the starting line up and actually playing the position. Cuthbertson never played hooker in any game for Leeds

I know, that's the point we've been telling Smokey

Re: Segayaro : Sat Sep 10, 2016 6:59 pm  

chicko is a fantastic signing for us,if he stays injury free next season we will have a lot more direction in attack and also a better defensive structure with him defending down the middle channel

i think that there will be another quality signing to come tho for 2017 who will be a proven half back

Re: Segayaro : Sat Sep 10, 2016 7:05 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

I know, that's the point we've been telling Smokey

I think you are arguing against yourself

Re: Segayaro : Sat Sep 10, 2016 8:02 pm  

Fallon wrote:

Is there a prize for the most childlike bickering thread that I have not been made aware of?

"Momentum Rule" award.

Re: Segayaro : Sun Sep 11, 2016 12:49 pm  

ThePrinter wrote:

I know, that's the point we've been telling Smokey

erm.... No you havent. You have been arguing for the importance a 'Proper hooker' not only in Segeyaro but as a back up too, (one that isnt Burrow)

I have been educating you to the fact Leeds have played many many games without a 'proper hooker' Not only playing Burrow there, but others. Why you think the nominal naming of a player like Cuthbertson at hooker or a championship standard hooker like Ward helps, rather than disproves your argument i dont know. (also why, when we play in 3 competitions, only the least important one counts, again im not sure)

Re: Segayaro : Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:49 pm  

He might have signed his shiny new deal with us, and his NRL clause has now gone, but..... word on the street down under is that the Sharkies could well come knocking still.

Would the club stand in his way if he said he didn't want to come back?

Re: Segayaro : Thu Nov 03, 2016 3:07 pm  

There is probably that NRL clause still in place. He wants to play Origin doesn't he?

Re: Segayaro : Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:50 pm  

Bang wrote:

There is probably that NRL clause still in place. He wants to play Origin doesn't he?

I think Cameron Smith and Jake Friend might say something about that. He might as well wait until Smith retires before going back.

Re: Segayaro : Fri Nov 04, 2016 12:19 am  

I think the main problem for Chicko may be the depreciation of sterling following Brexit.