Re: SLQ 7 - Leigh Centurions H. : Mon Sep 26, 2016 8:49 pm  

SmokeyTA wrote:

I dont think it is possible for me to simplify it any further for you.

" There is no reason for it to be necessary that to be the exception "

Brilliant , just what are you suggesting this means ?

Can anybody explain this to me ?

Re: SLQ 7 - Leigh Centurions H. : Mon Sep 26, 2016 8:53 pm  

GUBRATS wrote:

" There is no reason for it to be necessary that to be the exception "

Brilliant , just what are you suggesting this means ?

Can anybody explain this to me ?

There is no reason for it it to be necessary for that to be the exception (the exception as previously stated being smaller clubs success)

This is the point in Starbugs postings where he either lies or pretends to be stupid. (there is no exception to this rule)

Re: SLQ 7 - Leigh Centurions H. : Mon Sep 26, 2016 8:58 pm  

SmokeyTA wrote:

There is no reason for it to be necessary that to be the exception. There is no reason that this structure we have (in all senses of the word) has to be that way. It isnt the beauty of sport, the beauty of sport would be if there was a realistic chance of the next couple of years Leigh packing out houses and being successful. Like the NRL where as of this year every club bar the new Gold Coast club will have appeared in a GF.

So the top four pack their houses out and forget whats below them.You have had a wake up call in reality this season,one you haven't seen for many a year and now you compare the system to NRL.You really could have done with a feeder club this season.

Re: SLQ 7 - Leigh Centurions H. : Mon Sep 26, 2016 8:58 pm  

SmokeyTA wrote:

There is no reason for it it to be necessary for that to be the exception (the exception as previously stated being smaller clubs success)

This is the point in Starbugs postings where he either lies or pretends to be stupid. (there is no exception to this rule)

Ah , " for that to be the exception "

You missed out the " For "

Right I'll read it again now

Back in a mo

Re: SLQ 7 - Leigh Centurions H. : Mon Sep 26, 2016 9:01 pm  

atomic wrote:

So the top four pack their houses out and forget whats below them.You have had a wake up call in reality this season,one you haven't seen for many a year and now you compare the system to NRL.You really could have done with a feeder club this season.

If you could get past the little club syndrome you would see im actually suggesting the opposite. That it is a problem that the big 4 monopolise success. Even if some people pretend they dont.

Re: SLQ 7 - Leigh Centurions H. : Mon Sep 26, 2016 9:12 pm  

SmokeyTA wrote:

There is no reason for it to be necessary FOR that to be the exception. There is no reason that this structure we have (in all senses of the word) has to be that way.

Nope sorry even with the missing ' for ' , this just doesn't make sense

Re: SLQ 7 - Leigh Centurions H. : Mon Sep 26, 2016 9:13 pm  

GUBRATS wrote:

Nope sorry even with the missing ' for ' , this just doesn't make sense

tell me what you are struggling with and ill see if I can dumb it down any further for you.

Re: SLQ 7 - Leigh Centurions H. : Mon Sep 26, 2016 9:14 pm  

SmokeyTA wrote:

If you could get past the little club syndrome you would see im actually suggesting the opposite. That it is a problem that the big 4 monopolise success. Even if some people pretend they dont.

This I understand , but you don't suggest a solution

Oh and this ' little club syndrome ' ? , go on give us a clue

Re: SLQ 7 - Leigh Centurions H. : Mon Sep 26, 2016 9:17 pm  

SmokeyTA wrote:

tell me what you are struggling with and ill see if I can dumb it down any further for you.

Away you go , not a clue what you are attempting to say , no doubt like everybody else , but they are pretending they understand , you've heard of ' The Empoers New Clothes ' I assume

Re: SLQ 7 - Leigh Centurions H. : Mon Sep 26, 2016 9:19 pm  

GUBRATS wrote:

This I understand , but you don't suggest a solution

The solution is obvious. You dont like the solution though.

Oh and this ' little club syndrome ' ? , go on give us a clue

the chip on the shoulder carried certain fans of smaller clubs.