Re: Well Done Storm : Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:28 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

Really?

We came closer to scoring more times than Melbourne. They only won the game really with about 2 minutes left, it was anyone's game before that.

Re: Well Done Storm : Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:33 pm  

Sibbs Rhinos wrote:

We came closer to scoring more times than Melbourne. They only won the game really with about 2 minutes left, it was anyone's game before that.

Fair enough, but McGuire's try shouldn't have stood anyway. I was absolutely shocked by Watkins handling though, although he does have plenty of time to learn!

Re: Well Done Storm : Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:34 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

How am I not talking rugby?

I've stated that Melbourne gave Leeds a dose of their own medicine : Laying on and timing it to perfection in tune with the ref's whistle.

that's trolling like a child. Melbourne are masters of slowing the game something I really respect if I'm totally honest. I have always enjoyed the technical side of defending much more than attacking play. You ate just taking cheap shots. get em in you will need em this year.

Re: Well Done Storm : Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:34 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

Fair enough, but McGuire's try shouldn't have stood anyway. I was absolutely shocked by Watkins handling though, although he does have plenty of time to learn!

There was no concise evidence to weather he was offside or onside, so the benefit of the doubt was rightly given. RE to watkins, he has alot to learn but I still think he has a great future ahead of him.

Re: Well Done Storm : Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:36 pm  

Sibbs Rhinos wrote:

We came closer to scoring more times than Melbourne. They only won the game really with about 2 minutes left, it was anyone's game before that.

What he said!

Re: Well Done Storm : Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:37 pm  

sgtwilko wrote:

that's trolling like a child. Melbourne are masters of slowing the game something I really respect if I'm totally honest. I have always enjoyed the technical side of defending much more than attacking play. You ate just taking cheap shots. get em in you will need em this year.

You keep thinking that then, if I was trolling I would just come on with blatant ones like "Leeds are poop" etc.


You've agreed with the point I made, so it obviously held some validity, I like to see a team do that, time it perfectly to the ref's whistle, all i'm saying is that Leeds got beaten at their own game tonight.

Re: Well Done Storm : Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:38 pm  

Sibbs Rhinos wrote:

RE to watkins, he has alot to learn but I still think he has a great future ahead of him.

I agree with that, he's certainly heading in the right direction with gettin experience like the WCC under his belt.

Re: Well Done Storm : Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:39 pm  

CAM. wrote:

Manu, Kite, Stanley.

Ah, so a bunch of guys that either played very little, or none of, their GF winning season. Thought so. We were in the same boat missing Ablett, Donald and for a large part Sinfield.

Re: Well Done Storm : Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:40 pm  

DoubleAone wrote:

The Ozzies werent really interested.

They weren't though.

They were delighted at the end to have played at 70% and won.

Re: Well Done Storm : Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:40 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

I agree with that, he's certainly heading in the right direction with gettin experience like the WCC under his belt.

You’re obsessed with our board – you post more in her than you do on the Bulls board.

I bet you were one of those kids who pulled the hair of the girl you secretly fancied.