Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Tue Sep 02, 2014 9:15 pm  

William Eve wrote:

who hijack every thread in order to push their tiresome agenda. Many of them appear to be Leeds fans too. No surprises there.

You having a giggle mate?

'Hey look at me, I'm as predictable as a blue sky on a sunny day, whatever the popular opinion is on here, i have the opposite opinion to invoke a reaction!'

In terms of people who hijack every thread in order to push their tiresome agenda, karmichael Hunts like you are right at the top of the list.

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Wed Sep 03, 2014 9:10 am  

Swoggy Loiner wrote:

I said the exact same thing. If he's banned I'll turn my back on the game. Pathetic.

You'll walk away from the game if hes proved to be a homophobe?

hmmmmm

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Wed Sep 03, 2014 9:24 am  

frepneyboy wrote:

You'll walk away from the game if hes proved to be a homophobe?

hmmmmm

Proved to be a homophobe? you mean he specifically prejudices against people of a different sexual orientation? Is that what you are trying to say.

I'll bet any money you personally have used the exact term people are alleging him to have used Friday, in the last few weeks. Are you a homophobe too?

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Wed Sep 03, 2014 9:29 am  

Gotcha wrote:

Proved to be a homophobe? you mean he specifically prejudices against people of a different sexual orientation? Is that what you are trying to say.

I'll bet any money you personally have used the exact term people are alleging him to have used Friday, in the last few weeks. Are you a homophobe too?

No. I'm not. Nor do i use those terms.

And i'm not a role model to young kids and the wider society with previous form for that kind of abuse.

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Wed Sep 03, 2014 9:30 am  

frepneyboy wrote:

You'll walk away from the game if hes proved to be a homophobe?

hmmmmm

That's what I said. It will never be proved what he actually said from those video clips alone. If he is banned it's purely based on assumption rather than fact just to please the members of the Zak Haraker witch hunt. Trial by social media is all this farce is.

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Wed Sep 03, 2014 9:45 am  

frepneyboy wrote:

No. I'm not. Nor do i use those terms.

And i'm not a role model to young kids and the wider society with previous form for that kind of abuse.

Absolute rubbish. You have not called someone a puff? don't talk daft. Many people are lying over their use of these terms. Yes they are not meaning it with any prejudice, but the majority do say it.

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Wed Sep 03, 2014 9:56 am  

Gotcha wrote:

Absolute rubbish. You have not called someone a puff? don't talk daft. Many people are lying over their use of these terms. Yes they are not meaning it with any prejudice, but the majority do say it.

I've got a mate who plays for Sharlston and he was one of the biggest thugs going. His language towards opposing players was crude to say the least. Now I'm not bemoaning his actions as I was no saint when I played either, but he now informs me that Hardaker's actions are a disgrace to the game and as a role model he shouldn't put on a shirt again until 2015. How ironic that he's also a Wigan fan born and raised in Featherstone.

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Wed Sep 03, 2014 10:35 am  

sgtwilko wrote:

I see those wire clowns have started a thread up. What a bitter set of no hope fans they are.

The only bitter person I see here is you.

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Wed Sep 03, 2014 10:38 am  

Vespid_Wire wrote:

The only bitter person I see here is you.

Then you are blind.

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Wed Sep 03, 2014 10:43 am  

Swoggy Loiner wrote:

but he now informs me that Hardaker's actions are a disgrace to the game and as a role model he shouldn't put on a shirt again until 2015.

That's it then. Case closed right there!