Re: Transfer Talk / Rumour Thread V2 : Tue Jun 04, 2019 1:18 pm
Bang wrote:
2015 - 2017 we had 2 half backs who were around 27.9 million times better than Luke Gale. So he wasn't good enough for us.
When he was at Leeds - he wasn't good enough for us.
2019 - he's had 2 serious injuries in 2 years. He won't be good enough for us.
Would hate us to waste what could be a big slice of our cap on Gale.
Jackson Hastings please.
When he was at Leeds - he wasn't good enough for us.
2019 - he's had 2 serious injuries in 2 years. He won't be good enough for us.
Would hate us to waste what could be a big slice of our cap on Gale.
Jackson Hastings please.
Given the choice between Gale or Hastings, at this moment in time Hastings is the better option. Younger and doesn’t have the massive question mark that Gale does considering the injury he’s had.
But, and it’s a big BUT that you don’t agree with - a fully-fit Luke Gale is head and shoulders above anything I’ve seen from Jackson Hastings.
PS - I’m not massively into statistics are there is more to the game, but I’d love to see some kind of evidence that Leeds had two half backs 27.9m times better than Gale. Is that borne out by any kind of evidence that would usually be give an indication as to the quality of a half back (try assists?).
However, there’s one stat that counts. Grand final rings. And in that respect, Galey has as many as I do.