Fallon wrote:
You said the pack isn't as bad as people say yet fans and pundits alike have been saying how poor our pack is all season. They make few breaks, win few collisions and give few fast play of the balls in attack and have leaked so many tries close to the line. How are they not that bad?
As for Tui, most have been calling for him to be run out of town, if his fat 'arris can even run that far yet now you think he is the right man to partner Hastings should he appear.
You have been a proponent of both the bad pack and Tui ain't good enough views previously but it's fine to change your mind. Just don't try and pass it off when someone calls you on it.
Our pack is not good enough. Tui is not good enough. It's just how it is.
You haven’t called me on anything. You have jumped to an extreme, being aggressive for no reason. You don’t seem to realise middle ground.
Your point on the pack is incorrect, by a long way, all backed up by facts. Would I prefer better? Of course. Is it a reason for our problems? Is it hell. Ferres is an issue, but the props do their job far better than given credit, and Merrin has been as good as any forward in super league.
The foundations are there laid by the pack, but the halfs have been horrendous.
As for Lolohea, I actually stated in the very post you jumped to a massive incorrect conclusion on, that I still think he should go. I simply said he would be our best option to partner Hastings. This from the choices we have. I have seen Myler and Sutcliffe fail all year, and don’t believe partnering someone else will change with these. I do think Lolohea would compliment Hastings better. That is not long term.
Like I said, read in the context they are posted, rather than silly point scoring. Because your last sentence, nobody as actually argued on.