Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Wed Sep 03, 2014 3:26 pm  

This is a shambles and it could get very messy, I'm fairly sure Hetherington wouldn't have issued that statement without seeking some advice from legal bods!

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Wed Sep 03, 2014 3:27 pm  

These situations can rapidly escalate , this has the potential to do so. High court here we come.

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Wed Sep 03, 2014 3:29 pm  

Gotcha wrote:

Just seen he is the appointed video ref for Friday. He really should be stood down to elsewhere, that is not right at all.

I've just said the same thing on Twitter and got hounded for it...

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Wed Sep 03, 2014 3:32 pm  

5 minutes ago @SilversRef couldn't comment...

"2 sides to every story. Shouldn't always believe everything that's written !! "

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Wed Sep 03, 2014 3:33 pm  

RhinoLaney wrote:

I've just said the same thing on Twitter and got hounded for it...

A formal complaint should be made about silverwood and his integrity, he should not be ref at all until the issues clearly highlighted by GH are addressed let alone a ref in a Leeds game. Typical RFL though

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Wed Sep 03, 2014 3:35 pm  

Ferdy wrote:

A formal complaint should be made about silverwood and his integrity, he should not be ref at all until the issues clearly highlighted by GH are addressed let alone a ref in a Leeds game. Typical RFL though

A Rhinos Fan has just told me to shut up for saying he shouldn't be anywhere near our game on Friday.

Apparently if what I said is true Zak should also be banned while it's all sorted...

Thoughts?!

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Wed Sep 03, 2014 3:37 pm  

thebloodbath wrote:

http://www.therhinos.co.uk/news/23751.php#.VAcfI6NZiKU

Lip readers and Gal !

It's a disgrace. The RFL and the opposition fans can go f*ck themselves.

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Wed Sep 03, 2014 3:41 pm  

RFL "we can't be seen to investigate based on a ridiculous Twitter storm can we"

Silversref "do you need it in the report? I heard something but not sure what"

Interesting development.

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Wed Sep 03, 2014 3:44 pm  

Ferdy wrote:

A formal complaint should be made about silverwood and his integrity, he should not be ref at all until the issues clearly highlighted by GH are addressed let alone a ref in a Leeds game. Typical RFL though

I think both Hardaker and Silverwood should be respected and treated properly. I don't want to see a witch hunt of a ref and I don't want to see a witch hunt of a player.

I think Leeds have raised a lot of good points, but maybe those points should have been made in conversation directly with the RFL and not in a virtual declaration of war.

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Wed Sep 03, 2014 3:49 pm  

Lord God Jose Mourinho wrote:

I think both Hardaker and Silverwood should be respected and treated properly. I don't want to see a witch hunt of a ref and I don't want to see a witch hunt of a player.

I think Leeds have raised a lot of good points, but maybe those points should have been made in conversation directly with the RFL and not in a virtual declaration of war.

IMHO the Leeds Statement is valid and is necessary, given their assertions, and again I think Silverwood should not be put in charge on Friday.