Re: The Official Pitch Damaged thread! : Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:54 am  

Him wrote:

To be fair they got 2000 at the last game, which is better than most RL second division clubs.

Better than London!

Re: The Official Pitch Damaged thread! : Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:36 pm  

MjM wrote: So Rhodri Mcatee, whoever you are. Go **** yourself. https://twitter.com/search?q=Beautiful% ... e&src=typd From his twitter account he look like a bit of a noob.

MjM wrote: So Rhodri Mcatee, whoever you are. Go **** yourself. https://twitter.com/search?q=Beautiful% ... e&src=typd From his twitter account he look like a bit of a noob.

Re: The Official Pitch Damaged thread! : Wed Jan 09, 2013 7:57 pm  

Him wrote:

To be fair they got 2000 at the last game, which is better than most RL second division clubs.

There appears to be widespread acceptance amongst Tykes fans that their attendance figures are systematically over-stated, but then that will only ever be hearsay. The same may well apply to London.

Re: The Official Pitch Damaged thread! : Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:35 pm  

JerryChicken wrote:

Nope, Eukanuba

I saw his son Chris Jr on telly a few weeks ago . He ain't a bad fighter , but he will never be as good as his old man .

BR

Re: The Official Pitch Damaged thread! : Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:04 am  

JerryChicken wrote:

Its a bit like paying to go to The Vue to watch a Batman film on screen 1 and then spending all of your time b1tching and whining on at no-one in particular that they were showing an X-Men film on screen 2 and that they shouldn't.

No, actually, its a bit like paying to go to The Vue to watch a Batman film in the summer and then b1tching and whining to no-one in particular that they will be showing the new X-Men film in the same cinema next winter.

Actually, in some cases it's more like reading a review of the Batman film on the internet and then complaining that the local cinema is showing the new X-Men film next winter.

X-Men films are poop though, to be fair.

I'm losing track of which bits are metaphor and which are the actual point here.

What was I saying?

Carry on. Oh look, lights. Cool. *wanders off*

Re: The Official Pitch Damaged thread! : Fri Jan 11, 2013 6:00 pm  

El Diablo wrote:

Actually, in some cases it's more like reading a review of the Batman film on the internet and then complaining that the local cinema is showing the new X-Men film next winter.

X-Men films are poop though, to be fair.

I'm losing track of which bits are metaphor and which are the actual point here.

What was I saying?

Carry on. Oh look, lights. Cool. *wanders off*

Ive watched neither Batman nor X-Men films, at the cinema or anywhere else, nothing but nothing will ever match the Adam West Batman, nothing, do you hear, nothing, Batman should always be played slightly camp and very hammy, Robin should always be over the top and bouncing around like he's just taken a tub full of amphetamine and there should always be that suspicion hankering in the background that "Should a wealthy man be permitted to have a younger ward live with him in his remote house, what were the adoption agency thinking ?"

[Wheels]

Re: The Official Pitch Damaged thread! : Fri Jan 11, 2013 6:19 pm  

Nobody messes with Adam We...

[Ex-Swarcliffe Rhino]

Re: The Official Pitch Damaged thread! : Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:06 pm  

Awesome west.

Re: The Official Pitch Damaged thread! : Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:56 pm  

JerryChicken wrote:

El Diablo wrote:

Actually, in some cases it's more like reading a review of the Batman film on the internet and then complaining that the local cinema is showing the new X-Men film next winter.

X-Men films are poop though, to be fair.

I'm losing track of which bits are metaphor and which are the actual point here.

What was I saying?

Carry on. Oh look, lights. Cool. *wanders off*

Ive watched neither Batman nor X-Men films, at the cinema or anywhere else, nothing but nothing will ever match the Adam West Batman, nothing, do you hear, nothing, Batman should always be played slightly camp and very hammy, Robin should always be over the top and bouncing around like he's just taken a tub full of amphetamine and there should always be that suspicion hankering in the background that "Should a wealthy man be permitted to have a younger ward live with him in his remote house, what were the adoption agency thinking ?"

excentric local millionaire personalities would never have abused their positions in the 60s

Re: The Official Pitch Damaged thread! : Mon Jan 14, 2013 12:25 pm  

I find the new batman film franchise (mean and moody) all a bit boring actually.

Probably many won't agree but I found the mid 90's film version of Batman the most enjoyable, Batman Forever. Val Kilmer as Batman, Tommy Lee Jones as Two Faces, Jim Carey who was born to play Riddler and Nicole Kidman for the eye candy. Good cast and the film seemed to read colourfully like the comic books of that era.