Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Tue Sep 09, 2014 2:23 pm  

frepneyboy wrote:

Resorting to personal insults in a thread about possible disgusting insults thrown by one of your own players.

Nice

Having had the absolute misfortune to have stood (more than once) in the Threepenny stand all I can say is that if you are not the biggest f*****g hypocrite ever to post on an internet website then may my cock drop off.


Nope, still there.

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Tue Sep 09, 2014 2:54 pm  

frepneyboy wrote:

Resorting to personal insults in a thread about possible disgusting insults thrown by one of your own players.

Nice

If you really think "effing puff" when aimed at an oppo RL player is a "disgusting insult" then you are a disgusting insult for a human being.

But you don't though. You're just a sad troll bas**** with nothing better to do.

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Tue Sep 09, 2014 3:03 pm  

Lord God Jose Mourinho wrote:

If you really think "effing puff" when aimed at an oppo RL player is a "disgusting insult" then you are a disgusting insult for a human being.

But you don't though. You're just a sad troll bas**** with nothing better to do.

My my, a little harsh.

If we are looking at "disgusting insults of human beings" then there are plenty above me.

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Tue Sep 09, 2014 3:12 pm  

frepneyboy wrote:

My my, a little harsh.

If we are looking at "disgusting insults of human beings" then there are plenty above me.

You are a bit desperate for attention, a little bit of a drama queen are you not?

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Tue Sep 09, 2014 3:30 pm  

Jeez Louise! What is with the over-the-top aggression and name calling? Frepny's view may be one that is more in the minority, but just calm down a bit!

Straight people are allowed to be (and sometimes are) offended by 'gay insults' like white people can be offended by racial insults. So from that perspective, I get where he is coming from.

All the rest about the level of his own hypocrisy - I can't comment on, but I don't think he is wrong in his point outlined above.

Anyway - let's see how long before this gets to 100 pages!

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Tue Sep 09, 2014 3:32 pm  

Well it is now challenging the Mcdermott GO! thread which took an embarrassing 3 years to build in comparison.Could we really have a challenger for the 'Bailey' thread?!

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Tue Sep 09, 2014 3:35 pm  

Biff Tannen wrote:

Well it is now challenging the Mcdermott GO! thread which took an embarrassing 3 years to build in comparison.Could we really have a challenger for the 'Bailey' thread?!

What is the 'Bailey' thread? I've not seen it before. Has it managed to break the magic 100-page-barrier?

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Tue Sep 09, 2014 3:37 pm  

Biff Tannen wrote:

Well it is now challenging the Mcdermott GO! thread which took an embarrassing 3 years to build in comparison.Could we really have a challenger for the 'Bailey' thread?!

In my time on here, the heated discussion last autumn about JJB modelling the new kit has been my personal favourite - some real passion from posters on different sides of the argument. I just can't wait to see if he models for next season too, then that thread might have a second-wind like this one as well!

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Tue Sep 09, 2014 3:38 pm  

Jamie101 wrote:

What is the 'Bailey' thread? I've not seen it before. Has it managed to break the magic 100-page-barrier?

I haven't seen it knocking around for a while but it was impressive.well over 100 pages iirc. Usually dredged back up when an opposition fan took grievance to mr.Bailey after game day, so quite often! Very amusing.

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Tue Sep 09, 2014 4:40 pm  

Jamie101 wrote:

Jeez Louise! What is with the over-the-top aggression and name calling? Frepny's view may be one that is more in the minority, but just calm down a bit!

Straight people are allowed to be (and sometimes are) offended by 'gay insults' like white people can be offended by racial insults. So from that perspective, I get where he is coming from.

All the rest about the level of his own hypocrisy - I can't comment on, but I don't think he is wrong in his point outlined above.

Anyway - let's see how long before this gets to 100 pages!

Not according to Stephen Fry

"It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so f--g what"