Re: Aussies at it again! : Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:31 am  

McLaren_Field wrote:

And in true Columbo style...

Really?
I must have missed the one where Coloumbo didnt bother to respond to what anyone had to say, completely disregareded all evidence and facts presneted, completely ignored the fact that everything of substance he said was proved to be wrong, and just went around randomly insulting people...then pulled out a random piece of 'evidence' which has nothing to do with the thing in discussion, then sat there all smug asif he'd won.

Re: Aussies at it again! : Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:39 am  

McLaren_Field wrote:

"Widnes 'till i die" off on another finger wagging pontification

Its very easy to get under your skin, you really should step down off that high horse and take on board the absolute fact of life that sometimes people have a different point of view and a different life experience to you and that very fact does not automatically make them wrong, however I will not hold my breath while you grow accustomed to that life skill.

I could've sworn i'd already addressed this point... i guess i must be wrong... oh wait here it is:

why do you think, that i dont like people who offer opinions which differ to mine? is it because you didnt bother to read my posts, or because you didnt understand them? because i specifically remember telling sgtwilko this: "Why do i argue your point? maybe it has something to do with the fact that i dont like people falsely telling others they are incorrect, there are few things more annoying to me than an ignorant 'know it all'."
So no its not me disliking people who have a differing opinion to mine, its, people telling others (from a position of ignorance) that they are wrong, when this isnt the case, which i dislike - i thought i made myself quite clear before (apparently not clear enough )

Apparently you also seem to think that, i havent proven sgtwilko wrong, you must have missed all the posts like this one, in which i completely destroyed his whole argument (i even put it int bold, because even by this point i was getting sick of defeating the same point time and time again, again you seemed to have missed all of this):

You asserted that, the statement 'Anyone can be racist, it doesnt matter whether they are a part of an ethnic minority or not' is incorrect.
You have supported it by the 'fact' that: racism is oppression, and you cant oppress if you are part of the 'enpowered majority'.
This supporting evidence is based entirely on your definition of the term racism.
Can you not see how this is circular reasoning?
Your whole argument can be condensed down to: 'your statement about the definition of racism is wrong, because mine is right' (because as i've said, your supporting evidence holds, if and only if your premise (that your definition of racism is the only correct one) is true)
And as i've shown, your definition isn't supported by any of the dictionaries i've bothered to check, isnt supported by the UN or the European Parliament, and isnt supported by the majority of the public.
Im sorry but you have categorically, been proved wrong.
Which of this are you failing to comprehend?

Re: Aussies at it again! : Mon Jun 14, 2010 9:45 am  

Oh dear

Like I said, so easy to wind up, so easy to discover the hypocrisy of a poor troll - we've had the best on here, you were just too simple to uncover.

Re: Aussies at it again! : Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:10 am  

Widnes 'till i die wrote:

Apparently you also seem to think that, i havent proven sgtwilko wrong, you must have missed all the posts like this one, in which i completely destroyed his whole argument

And I can crush grapes and rip tissues.

Re: Aussies at it again! : Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:09 pm  

McLaren_Field wrote:

So you do write some thing that you regret when conversing with your insomniac friends at 2am ?

Depends what I write. If I'm calling Ramrod a [insert name here] then I shouldn't really write it on here but dont necessarily regret it as it's true.

I only regret one banning where I upset a 3rd party.

Re: Aussies at it again! : Mon Jun 14, 2010 1:05 pm  

Era of the Biff wrote:

Depends what I write. If I'm calling Ramrod a [insert name here] then I shouldn't really write it on here but dont necessarily regret it as it's true.

I only regret one banning where I upset a 3rd party.

How many times have you been (I was tempted use "being" here to reverse a trend) banned exactly?

Re: Aussies at it again! : Mon Jun 14, 2010 1:16 pm  

Ronzy wrote:

How many times have you been (I was tempted use "being" here to reverse a trend) banned exactly?

He's not been known for his tact and diplomacy since he was ejected from the Diplomatic Corps!
Completely misunderstood of course!

[Wheels]

Re: Aussies at it again! : Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:26 pm  

Ronzy wrote:

How many times have you been (I was tempted use "being" here to reverse a trend) banned exactly?

Re: Aussies at it again! : Mon Jun 14, 2010 3:25 pm  

Ronzy wrote:

How many times have you been (I was tempted use "being" here to reverse a trend) banned exactly?

Hmmm.

Chipembele, Perpetual Motion, Brassneck, Blue n Amber, Polska Nosorozec, Chip-em-bay-lee, Dutoni.

I'm sure the rest of you can help me out. MClaren Field certainly can, along with the Wakefield mods.

Re: Aussies at it again! : Mon Jun 14, 2010 3:30 pm  

Era of the Biff wrote:

Hmmm.

Chipembele, Perpetual Motion, Brassneck, Blue n Amber, Polska Nosorozec, Chip-em-bay-lee, Dutoni.

I'm sure the rest of you can help me out. MClaren Field certainly can, along with the Wakefield mods.

Ouzo time?