cod'ead wrote:
I'd say the lad was ignorant of the meaning. Not an excuse that could be extended to the vast majority of adults.
It's not too long ago that Kelvin's Ferret used the term "window licker" on the sin bin. Now although I found it difficult to believe that an intelligent adult would not know the meaning of the term, his level of contrition convinced me that he truly did not know the meaning of the phrase he used.
I don't think I've criticised Hardaker per se. My criticisms have been saved for those who would simply dismiss all allegations against him as "banter"
I agree. But I'd also suggest that the word Hardaker is accused of using has been widely used without any homophobic intent or meaning on the part of the person saying it.
What I'm trying to say is that words true meaning are dependent on both context and the users intent.
For instance the lad I coached used, what is thought of as a homophobic word, but he didn't mean it as such and certainly isn't homophobic.
I've said earlier in the thread I have severe reservations about how this is being investigated by the RFL, I think it's setting a dangerous precedent. But that doesn't mean I think Hardaker is blameless.
Personally I don't think he's homophobic. I think he's yet another fine example of Jerry's Big Daft Lad Theory. I think he struggles to control himself and to compose himself in certain situations and has a lot of growing up to do. I think he just blurts out the first words that come into his head.
Personally I think, if it's proved he said it, Leeds should fine him for being so stupid after his first indiscretion and give him a final warning.
I am, however, uncomfortable with the governing body banning players for saying things on the pitch (other than at match officials). As I said I think it's opening up a very dangerous precedent for the RFL.
