Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Tue Jun 10, 2014 8:18 pm  

meatpaste wrote:

He won't cop a ban. He is a Leeds player (not allowed).

Peacock won't get one either. (same reason)

I rest my case

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Tue Jun 10, 2014 8:30 pm  

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Tue Jun 10, 2014 8:35 pm  

It's amazing supporting a club who can dictate the governing body, other clubs could only dream of our power

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Tue Jun 10, 2014 8:37 pm  

meatpaste wrote:

I rest my case

What case, please enlighten us

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Tue Jun 10, 2014 8:43 pm  

Tony Soprano wrote:

What case, please enlighten us

Delighted to. Last weekend I was berated on here for 'suggesting' that Mr Peacock would escape a ban so case has duly been rested.

Hth

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Tue Jun 10, 2014 8:53 pm  

meatpaste wrote:

Delighted to. Last weekend I was berated on here for 'suggesting' that Mr Peacock would escape a ban so case has duly been rested.

Hth

I too thought he wouldn't get banned because it didn't deserve one.

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Tue Jun 10, 2014 8:57 pm  

Tony Soprano wrote:

I too thought he wouldn't get banned because it didn't deserve one.

It just shows the inconsistency of the RFL. Peacocks punching was sustained and should have been grade C not B.

Carney copped a ban for exactly the same thing.

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Tue Jun 10, 2014 9:16 pm  

5 match ban for Zak

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Tue Jun 10, 2014 9:21 pm  

Zak Hardaker of @leedsrhinos banned for 5 games and fined £300 after being found guilty of Grade E homophobic abuse

Re: Zak Hardaker - Statement : Tue Jun 10, 2014 9:22 pm  

I think Zak is a fantastic player and would love to have him at the Wire. He has apologised for his remarks which were made in the heat of the battle and I'm sure he regrets and like many of us wishes he could turn the clock back.

that said, what Zak said is wholly unacceptable and 5 games is about right.