OPTA Stats V Hull KR : Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:26 pm  

Player: Metres - Carries (MT/Carry) - Tackles - Misses (Efficiency %) - Errors - Penalties Leeds: 1282 - 184 (6.97) - 350 - 18 (95%) - 7 - 4 Hull KR: 1205 - 185 (6.51) - 307 - ? (??%) - 11 - 6 Webb: 69 - 15 (4.60) - 3 - 1 (75%) - 2 - 0 Watkins: 83 - 13 (6.38 ) - 0 - 1 (0%) - 0 - 0 Smith: 146 - 16 (9.13) - 9 - 2 (82%) - 2 - 1 Senior: 38 - 9 (4.22 ) - 37 - 0 (100%) - 0 - 1 Hall: 72 - 11 (6.55 ) - 6 - 0 (100%) - 0 - 0 McGuire: 64 - 14 (4.57) - 18 - 1 (95%) - 1 - 0 Burrow: 71 - 7 (10.14) - 13 - 2 (87%) - 1 - 0 Leuluai: 133 - 16 (8.31) - 23 - 2 (92%) - 0 - 0 Diskin: 39 - 6 (6.50) - 25 - 0 (100%) - 0 - 0 Peacock: 119 - 18 (6.61) - 43 - 0 (100%) - 0 - 0 Jones-Buchanan: 87 - 11 (7.91) - 33 - 0 (100%) - 0 - 2 Lauitiiti: 128 - 12 (10.67) - 23 - 0 (100%) - 0 - 0 Ablett: 49 - 9 (5.44) - 27 - 3 (90%) - 1 - 0 Ratu: 48 - 8 (6.00) - 12 - 1 (92%) - 0 - 0 Buderus: 53 - 7 (7.57) - 34 - 4 (89%) - 0 - 0 Manning: 29 - 5 (5.80) - 7 - 0 (100%) - 0 - 0 Burgess: 54 - 7 (7.71) - 37 - 1 (97%) - 0 - 0 The good news again this week is that I have no issues with the awarding of Try Assists: 2 - McGuire (Webb and Peacock's tries) Leeds actually won a penalty count and the error rate was pleasingly low especially given the wet (potential GF) conditions. The starting pack made 174 tackles while missing only 5 with Leuluai and Lauitiiti taking a turn at the top of the metre makers for a change. Senior didn't exactly rip it up going forward (wasted in his dual role?) but a great tackling stint. Previous week's stats: Wakefield V Leeds Hull V Leeds Leeds V Bradford Harlequins V Leeds Leeds V Huddersfield Les Catalans V Leeds [url=http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?t=412998&highlight=]Leeds V Hull [/url]

Player: Metres - Carries (MT/Carry) - Tackles - Misses (Efficiency %) - Errors - Penalties Leeds: 1282 - 184 (6.97) - 350 - 18 (95%) - 7 - 4 Hull KR: 1205 - 185 (6.51) - 307 - ? (??%) - 11 - 6 Webb: 69 - 15 (4.60) - 3 - 1 (75%) - 2 - 0 Watkins: 83 - 13 (6.38 ) - 0 - 1 (0%) - 0 - 0 Smith: 146 - 16 (9.13) - 9 - 2 (82%) - 2 - 1 Senior: 38 - 9 (4.22 ) - 37 - 0 (100%) - 0 - 1 Hall: 72 - 11 (6.55 ) - 6 - 0 (100%) - 0 - 0 McGuire: 64 - 14 (4.57) - 18 - 1 (95%) - 1 - 0 Burrow: 71 - 7 (10.14) - 13 - 2 (87%) - 1 - 0 Leuluai: 133 - 16 (8.31) - 23 - 2 (92%) - 0 - 0 Diskin: 39 - 6 (6.50) - 25 - 0 (100%) - 0 - 0 Peacock: 119 - 18 (6.61) - 43 - 0 (100%) - 0 - 0 Jones-Buchanan: 87 - 11 (7.91) - 33 - 0 (100%) - 0 - 2 Lauitiiti: 128 - 12 (10.67) - 23 - 0 (100%) - 0 - 0 Ablett: 49 - 9 (5.44) - 27 - 3 (90%) - 1 - 0 Ratu: 48 - 8 (6.00) - 12 - 1 (92%) - 0 - 0 Buderus: 53 - 7 (7.57) - 34 - 4 (89%) - 0 - 0 Manning: 29 - 5 (5.80) - 7 - 0 (100%) - 0 - 0 Burgess: 54 - 7 (7.71) - 37 - 1 (97%) - 0 - 0 The good news again this week is that I have no issues with the awarding of Try Assists: 2 - McGuire (Webb and Peacock's tries) Leeds actually won a penalty count and the error rate was pleasingly low especially given the wet (potential GF) conditions. The starting pack made 174 tackles while missing only 5 with Leuluai and Lauitiiti taking a turn at the top of the metre makers for a change. Senior didn't exactly rip it up going forward (wasted in his dual role?) but a great tackling stint. Previous week's stats: Wakefield V Leeds Hull V Leeds Leeds V Bradford Harlequins V Leeds Leeds V Huddersfield Les Catalans V Leeds [url=http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?t=412998&highlight=]Leeds V Hull [/url]

: Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:30 pm  

Good stats from Kylie... best go forward this season by the looks of it. Look at JP's tackles too, added to the meters made and it shows why he's regarded as one of the best props around.

: Tue Jul 21, 2009 7:37 am  

Smith's go forward is very good as well, although offset be his missed tackles, errors and penalties

: Tue Jul 21, 2009 7:40 am  

great analysis ....


except ...

didn't Kylie return a bunch of drop outs for easy meters

and didn't over half Smiths meters come off his try ???

: Tue Jul 21, 2009 7:51 am  

King Whino wrote:

great analysis ....


except ...

didn't Kylie return a bunch of drop outs for easy meters

and didn't over half Smiths meters come off his try ???

TVOC it looks like you need to put a disclaimer at the end of your stats. Either that or do an in depth analysis of all the figures you provide to explain any variances.

: Tue Jul 21, 2009 8:07 am  

finglas wrote:

Smith's go forward is very good as well, although offset be his missed tackles, errors and penalties

Smiths will include 80 metres for the try, just to show some consistency here, as I didn't give Donald credit for a similar thing in an earlier game.

Also point out Kylie, Ali, and JJB put in big efforts there, along with the usually excellent and expected Peacock.

Kylie really as come on a lot since signing that new contract, which kind of bucks the trend of players upping their game in order to get one.

Also Burgess tackling. Very much improved there, quite a suprise.

: Tue Jul 21, 2009 8:08 am  

finglas wrote:

TVOC it looks like you need to put a disclaimer at the end of your stats. Either that or do an in depth analysis of all the figures you provide to explain any variances.

There's a limit to the amount of server space available - in the world.

: Tue Jul 21, 2009 8:11 am  

McLaren_Field wrote:

There's a limit to the amount of server space available - in the world.

Were not going to run out of porn are we?

: Tue Jul 21, 2009 8:35 am  

Gotcha wrote:

Smiths will include 80 metres for the try, just to show some consistency here, as I didn't give Donald credit for a similar thing in an earlier game.

Also point out Kylie, Ali, and JJB put in big efforts there, along with the usually excellent and expected Peacock.

Kylie really as come on a lot since signing that new contract, which kind of bucks the trend of players upping their game in order to get one.

Also Burgess tackling. Very much improved there, quite a suprise.

It is an inprovement but he still missed one that led to a try


"Murrell kicked through for Cockayne to evade a stationary Luke Burgess and score"

: Tue Jul 21, 2009 8:36 am  

Tony Soprano wrote:

Were not going to run out of porn are we?

Yes in the future when you click on a dubious link, you'll be transported to a website with in depth analysis of Ryan Bailey's performance stats.

If you look at the other user profiles don't expect to see Jenna jameson if you click on Bluey.

Alternatively McBanana won't take you to a well hung scottish guy but you won't understand it at all.