Page 21 of 21

Re: SL RD 16 | London Broncos (N) Anfield

PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2019 9:31 am
by Seth
Walker, Newman and Oledszki should be in that list. Put them in a team with senior players who were doing their job and I think people would rightly be excited by their prospects, smith to a lesser degree.

Re: SL RD 16 | London Broncos (N) Anfield

PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2019 11:35 am
by Biff Tannen
Seth wrote:
Walker, Newman and Oledszki should be in that list. Put them in a team with senior players who were doing their job and I think people would rightly be excited by their prospects, smith to a lesser degree.


Agree with this.Turn of this decade when we still had most of the senior group in their pomp they would be seen as future stars and be standing out much more in a more often than not dominant team.

That doesn't mean they won't reach full potential in the current climate; infact they are getting far more game time than they would ever likely have got back then and if we can sort ourselves out sometime soon the experiences gained now could be invaluable.

Re: SL RD 16 | London Broncos (N) Anfield

PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2019 11:57 am
by christopher
Seth wrote:
Walker, Newman and Oledszki should be in that list. Put them in a team with senior players who were doing their job and I think people would rightly be excited by their prospects, smith to a lesser degree.


Anyone advocating getting rid of those three have lost the plot.

Re: SL RD 16 | London Broncos (N) Anfield

PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2019 12:33 pm
by KaeruJim
I don't think anyone is...?

Re: SL RD 16 | London Broncos (N) Anfield

PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2019 12:35 pm
by Seth
They were missing off the lists of must keep players?

Noticed you’d put those over 23 :CLAP:

Re: SL RD 16 | London Broncos (N) Anfield

PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2019 1:38 pm
by christopher
KaeruJim wrote:
I don't think anyone is...?



Yep sorry missed 'of the older players but'

Carry on :-)