Fielden and Prescott cautioned : Mon Jun 21, 2010 12:36 pm  

See here I don't think these were put on report were they? I noticed when I watched the replay last night a Wigan player using the elbow so I presume it was that, but I'm not sure what the Fielden incident was.

See here I don't think these were put on report were they? I noticed when I watched the replay last night a Wigan player using the elbow so I presume it was that, but I'm not sure what the Fielden incident was.

Re: Fielden and Prescott cautioned : Mon Jun 21, 2010 12:50 pm  

I remeber a couple of tackles were people, and I do recall it being fielden once, dragged jammer down by his head.
A letter regarding player safety and unnecessary roughness, i reckon.

Re: Fielden and Prescott cautioned : Mon Jun 21, 2010 12:55 pm  

Offside Monkey wrote:

I remeber a couple of tackles were people, and I do recall it being fielden once, dragged jammer down by his head.
A letter regarding player safety and unnecessary roughness, i reckon.

15 yards, automatic first down

Re: Fielden and Prescott cautioned : Mon Jun 21, 2010 12:59 pm  

Ski wrote:

15 yards, automatic first down

Word.

Re: Fielden and Prescott cautioned : Mon Jun 21, 2010 1:02 pm  

According to the RFL site, no charges for either just cautions http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id=2026 http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id=2025

According to the RFL site, no charges for either just cautions http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id=2026 http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id=2025

Re: Fielden and Prescott cautioned : Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:26 pm  

It's intersting to hear that most of us agree that Fielden and Prescott had top games and that Jammer was taken ill before the game and didnt make as much impact as he usually does, adding this to Saints large injury list makes the result a verygood one. I believe Saints have a good 25% improvement in them yet and hopefully peak at the right time.

Re: Fielden and Prescott cautioned : Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:29 pm  

Thought Cunningham might have got a caution for his shot in the back on Leuluai, but apparantly not.

Re: Fielden and Prescott cautioned : Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:34 pm  

sonny wrote:

It's intersting to hear that most of us agree that Fielden and Prescott had top games and that Jammer was taken ill before the game and didnt make as much impact as he usually does, adding this to Saints large injury list makes the result a verygood one. I believe Saints have a good 25% improvement in them yet and hopefully peak at the right time.

If we consider that our best pack + bench is (arguabley)
Graham Cunningham Hargreaves
Wilkin Soliola
Flannery
Roby, Faas, Puletua & Clough
Then that's quite a different kettle of fish than the one that took the field on Sunday. if we do start to get players back for the business end of the season, then we're really in business.

Re: Fielden and Prescott cautioned : Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:13 pm  

I reckon Fielden's was for trying to give lovebites in the tackle. At least that's what he seemed to be doing.

Re: Fielden and Prescott cautioned : Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:58 pm  

Offside Monkey wrote:

If we consider that our best pack + bench is (arguabley)
Graham Cunningham Hargreaves
Wilkin Soliola
Flannery
Roby, Faas, Puletua & Clough
Then that's quite a different kettle of fish than the one that took the field on Sunday. if we do start to get players back for the business end of the season, then we're really in business.

We didn't have our best pack out either, but the two seemed fairly evenly matched. Hansen, O'Loughlin, O'Carroll and Mossop were all missing and would have played yesterday IMO.