: Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:39 pm  

Blobbynator wrote:

I agree. He was bigger, stronger and played less minutes in 2006. That's when Maurie was at his best. We've got Graham, Cayless and Hargreaves who all offer workrate. We need Maurie to play for 25-30 minutes maximum and offer big impact.

I don't think Bryn is sufficient quality yet while JC has to prove his fitness - potentially leaves a lot on Graham

: Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:46 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

You want to come onto the Wigan site.

They've managed to get rid of about seven players, the coach, the kitman, the mascot, the lady who makes the tea, the chairman, the groundsman, the medical staff, the barman and the coach driver.

I think that about covers it.

I bl**dy despair at some so called fans.

Too be honest you mascot is Sh*t

Saint Viper wrote:

Hey leave the Mascot alone, he is my mate!!

Oops didn't see that.

: Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:59 pm  

Harborne Saint wrote:

I don't think Bryn is sufficient quality yet while JC has to prove his fitness - potentially leaves a lot on Graham

I am not convinced that Bryn will ever be good enough to be more than squad fodder.

I think Maurie has been "scoped out" more by opposition defences. Players tend to have hot and cold spells. Maurie is still a good player and will recover form.

Frodsham has been fantastic. Apart from Burgess' cheap shot (yes being 2 metres offside make it a cheap shot) he his looked much stronger than the men he has played against. You have to remember that Burgess is probably the best prop in the world and could do that to anyone. If you don't believe me go on to Youtube and look at his tackle on Moi Moi.

From what i have seen if Yates and Emmitt they are looking good too. Hopefully we will get these kids involved and rest James Graham a bit this season.