: Wed May 20, 2009 9:50 pm  

Doogal wrote:

no matey.

moore is not good enough, lets be fair he has not proved to be etter than Newton has he.

He hasn't, but i hav'nt given up on him. I dont like the idea of moving roby, he can play in the halves but is best where he is.

: Wed May 20, 2009 9:52 pm  

NO NO NO! to Newton.

Was a fine player who sadly sullied his reputation through acts of downright thuggish behaviour on the pitch

Past his best now and is 31 years old this year, so lets be honest its a none starter IMO

At this stage Scott Moore is looking like the ideal candidate to follow in KCs footsteps unless the coach decides to go with the single hooker option and play Roby for 80 minutes.

: Wed May 20, 2009 9:53 pm  

Ande wrote:

Thats because of Bradford going backwards
Him, Deacon and Burgess are the only ones to have performed consistently(ish)

Ive watched Bradford many times on Sky and Newton as done nothing! Even Stevo doesent cream himself over Terry anymore. He is a spent force.

BTW im no Newton hater either, he was a very good player on his day but not anymore. Rather have Scott Moore anyday.

: Wed May 20, 2009 9:54 pm  

The Chair Maker wrote:

NO NO NO! to Newton.

Was a fine player who sadly sullied his reputation through acts of downright thuggish behaviour on the pitch

Past his best now and is 31 years old this year, so lets be honest its a none starter IMO

At this stage Scott Moore is looking like the ideal candidate to follow in KCs footsteps unless the coach decides to go with the single hooker option and play Roby for 80 minutes.

I agree over newton, and moore could help us keep roby as the impact player he is.

: Wed May 20, 2009 9:56 pm  

Newton You lot are idiots.

Moore is outplaying him comfortably and is young and enthusiastic. Newton looks overweight and completely oblivious to whats going on around him.

So we're getting rid of Matt Gidley, KC and Sean Long and signing Terry effing Newton. You lot really do take le biscuit.

I'd still boo him even if he played for us. Scapegoatcity.

(It must be a wind up surely?)

: Wed May 20, 2009 9:59 pm  

surely our chairman wouldn't sign someone who cost us the league in 2005? Fair few quid missed out on there and i bet sir mac is still not happy about that

: Thu May 21, 2009 7:09 am  

Biggest load of bulsh1tt ever.
FACT.

: Thu May 21, 2009 7:12 am  

Doogal wrote:

Roby can play scrum half, so i know it seems ridiculous but stranger things have happened.

But not as well as Eastmond.
I can't see the point of having all three of KC, JR and TN on the squad.

: Thu May 21, 2009 7:56 am  

there is absolutely no way on this earth that st helens r.l.f.c would ever entertain the idea of moving for terry newton(*spit*)


scott moore will do a far better job for a lot longer i.m.o

: Thu May 21, 2009 8:01 am  

Sorry Ski but to suggest Saints would sign Newton instead of Moore is, well, nonsense.

Surprised you even bothered to post it.