: Mon Jun 15, 2009 10:19 pm  

We could play a youthfull team and still beat Wigan at KR.

1. Lomax
2. Armstrong
3. Dean
4. Foster
5. Meli
6. Wheeler
7. Eastmond
8. Graham
9. Roby
10. Cayless
11. Ashurst
12. Dixon
13. Clough

14. Faasavalu
15. Puletua
16. Hargreaves
17. Pryce

: Mon Jun 15, 2009 10:23 pm  

Your full team couldn't beat us 6 weeks ago.

: Mon Jun 15, 2009 10:35 pm  

Ashmeister wrote:

We could play a youthfull team and still beat Wigan at KR.

1. Lomax
2. Armstrong
3. Dean
4. Foster
5. Meli
6. Wheeler
7. Eastmond
8. Graham
9. Roby
10. Cayless
11. Ashurst
12. Dixon
13. Clough

14. Faasavalu
15. Puletua
16. Hargreaves
17. Pryce

You are in the clowds mate. No way would that team beat Wigan. The full team struggles as it is. Wigan aren't as bad as they make out. They'll be in the running for the GF this season.

: Mon Jun 15, 2009 10:50 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

You are in the clowds mate. No way would that team beat Wigan. The full team struggles as it is. Wigan aren't as bad as they make out. They'll be in the running for the GF this season.

: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:19 pm  

Ski wrote:

Compare this to the 2006 side who went to, and almost beat a full strength Catalans side

Ian Hardman
Gaz Langley
Craig Littler
Lee Gilmour
Dean McGilvray
Craig Ashall
Matty Smith
Nick Fozzard
Ian Webster
Paul Leyland
Vinnie Anderson
Paul Clough
James Graham
Scott Moore
Neil Rigby
Tommy Hodgkinson
Ste Bannister

The most exciting game that season.

: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:31 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

You are in the clowds mate. No way would that team beat Wigan. The full team struggles as it is. Wigan aren't as bad as they make out. They'll be in the running for the GF this season.

I never take anything you say into account.

: Tue Jun 16, 2009 12:07 am  

Ashmeister wrote:

We could play a youthfull team and still beat Wigan at KR.

1. Lomax
2. Armstrong
3. Dean
4. Foster
5. Meli
6. Wheeler
7. Eastmond
8. Graham
9. Roby
10. Cayless
11. Ashurst
12. Dixon
13. Clough

14. Faasavalu
15. Puletua
16. Hargreaves
17. Pryce

If Wigan put less than 50 points on that line-up, then they would feel disappointed.

: Tue Jun 16, 2009 12:11 am  

Ashmeister wrote:

youthfull

5. Meli
10. Cayless
14. Faasavalu
15. Puletua
17. Pryce

¿Qué?

: Tue Jun 16, 2009 12:17 am  

RB wrote:

¿Qué?

OK then.

1. Lomax
2. Armstrong
3. Foster
4. Dean
5. Bainsy
6. Wheeler
7. Eastmond
8. Graham
9. Roby
10. Hargreaves
11. Ashurst
12. Dixon
13. Clough

14. Ellis
15. Emmitt
16. Frodsham

We wouldent need 4 subs, that team would win by 50 plus against your shower!!

: Tue Jun 16, 2009 12:34 am  

We could put out a far better youthful team tbh....