Re: Stadium Site pictures : Wed Sep 29, 2010 12:13 pm  

gateaux wrote:

I am 5ft and have rarely had a problem with view when standing, I get in early enough I can position myself where I should be fine, if there is a problem its easy enough to move when stood anyway (not that I can remember the last time I had to). If anything I have had more problems when sitting as [b]I seem to always end up with the giants sat in front of me![/b]

I will be sitting in the new ground as it will be easier with 2 young children hopefully attending games within the next few seasons. If it wasn't for that though I would have happily stood at the new ground.

Just ask Sadfish to move if he's sat infront of you

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Wed Sep 29, 2010 12:37 pm  

Two Wheeled Saint wrote:

Just ask Sadfish to move if he's sat infront of you

Stood in front of you is worse!!!

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Wed Sep 29, 2010 4:14 pm  

gateaux wrote:

I am 5ft and have rarely had a problem with view when standing, I get in early enough I can position myself where I should be fine, if there is a problem its easy enough to move when stood anyway (not that I can remember the last time I had to). If anything I have had more problems when sitting as I seem to always end up with the giants sat in front of me!

I will be sitting in the new ground as it will be easier with 2 young children hopefully attending games within the next few seasons. If it wasn't for that though I would have happily stood at the new ground.

Thank you, whilst arguing for your new stadium as it will be you make my point for me, "I will be sitting in the new ground as it will be easier with 2 young children"

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Wed Sep 29, 2010 4:19 pm  

Arthur Warrior wrote:

Thank you, whilst arguing for your new stadium as it will be you make my point for me, "I will be sitting in the new ground as it will be easier with 2 young children"

Why exactly does that mean that there shouldn't be the option to sit or stand as there is now?

Just because my personal preference has changed it certainly doesn't mean that is what everyone else will want.

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Wed Sep 29, 2010 7:58 pm  

Arthur Warrior wrote:

Blah,blah,blah,blah........................

And what's even better about the new stadium is that like it or not the majority of you Goons are going to have to stand behind the sticks, as only a tiny proportion of seating, tucked away in the far corner, has been allocated for Away fans.

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Thu Sep 30, 2010 8:57 am  

Saint Viper wrote:

Stood in front of you is worse!!!

[Sadfish]

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Thu Sep 30, 2010 11:12 am  

Two Wheeled Saint wrote:

:DOH:

he gets the full force of my farts most matches!

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Thu Sep 30, 2010 11:20 am  

So it feckin is you!!!!

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Thu Sep 30, 2010 6:06 pm  

Saint Rabban wrote:

And what's even better about the new stadium is that like it or not the majority of you Goons are going to have to stand behind the sticks, as only a tiny proportion of seating, tucked away in the far corner, has been allocated for Away fans.

virtually every away section at every ground is behind the posts

Re: Stadium Site pictures : Sat Oct 02, 2010 7:04 am  

About time you lot got a new ground Knowsley road was about 30 years outta date, Never could see the match when full house......... It was the worst ground in SL.
One time the ball got kicked on the roof of the stand i was covered in asbestos dust , Health hazard ........Should of been closed down many years ago.