: Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:54 pm
Chris Saint wrote:
Any player returning from injury or long term absence isn't up to "match fitness" - at the start of a season everyone is the same boat so it doesn't matter but now everyone else is 5 games in he would tire out much quicker.
Indeed.
Chris Saint wrote:
How does any player return from injury without being spelled? Not neccesarily the Leeds game as it is a big one but unless he plays some part of games he'll never get that level of fitness from training alone.
He needs to build his fitness up in training and then be played when he is up to a sufficient level of fitness. For all we know he has done no training at all.
Chris Saint wrote:
We don't have to have a winger on the bench - if he feels ok after 60 leave him on - if not stick Gilmour there he is still quicker than our wingers as it is.
Why risk that though, it's just a stupid thing to do. Play a winger who won't be fit for 60 minutes and put a second row on the wing if he gets tired. If that is the case who will go to centre to replace Gilly?
Why take that chance instead of playing somebody who, while maybe a centre, has done nothing wrong so far on the wing and keep everybody else in position instead of playing Meli for 60 minutes and completely re-jigging your team.
Makes no sense.
Chris Saint wrote:
and just on C) - Tom wasn't in the team against Salford what makes you think he'd be back in this week? Not that i don't agree he has done well enough so far just wonder if Potter hasn't seen enough...and if you drop every player for playing badly once god help them!
No i wouldn't drop every player for playing bad. Meli needs to earn his spot, not just waltz back into the wing spot doing nothing and being in the UK for two days. Especially when the situation is entirely his own fault.