: Sat Apr 25, 2009 8:18 am  

i find it most amusing how fast the goons come on our site when we lose ,
and then have the cheek to tell us how crap we are , I think i speak for all the Saints posters on this site when i say we couldn't give a monkeys ar*e what you soft lads think of us, just look at the tables and weep LOSERS

: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:37 am  

Wellens Crap,,Gardner Crap !!!!!!!,,,both useless,,,,,,2nd defeat of the season,,,The knives are out!!!!!!What next Potter Out!!!!!!!?

: Sat Apr 25, 2009 10:09 am  

Walter Neff wrote:

Wellens Crap,,Gardner Crap !!!!!!!,,,both useless,,,,,,2nd defeat of the season,,,The knives are out!!!!!!What next Potter Out!!!!!!!?

Well, considering were carrying so many players that are useless, i'm surprised we are so successful.

: Sat Apr 25, 2009 10:34 am  

saint billy wrote:

Well, considering were carrying so many players that are useless, i'm surprised we are so successful.

Why?

Gidley = creates and scores tries = back-to-back sets = opposition tiring = even more tries.

Puletua = constantly sucks in 3 or 4 defenders = gaps for average/overated players to score = back-to-back-sets + opposition tiring = even more tries.

You got beat by a poor Bradford side last night and unless Gidley and Puletua regain fitness then expect more of the same against top-four/five sides.

: Sat Apr 25, 2009 11:07 am  

General Zod. wrote:

Why?

Gidley = creates and scores tries = back-to-back sets = opposition tiring = even more tries.

Puletua = constantly sucks in 3 or 4 defenders = gaps for average/overated players to score = back-to-back-sets + opposition tiring = even more tries.

You got beat by a poor Bradford side last night and unless Gidley and Puletua regain fitness then expect more of the same against top-four/five sides.

: Sat Apr 25, 2009 11:47 am  

The Chief wrote:

2/10.

See me.

You're being very generous with him there I think.

: Sat Apr 25, 2009 12:39 pm  

Saint Simon wrote: Less missed tackles per game than arguably the best fb http://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... 9&hp2=1142 1 missed tackle per game is pretty good thanks Why let facts get in the way of a demented argument? We (and Ade) deffo missed Gidley last night though. And I thought Wello should have had stopped one of their try scorers.

Saint Simon wrote: Less missed tackles per game than arguably the best fb http://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... 9&hp2=1142 1 missed tackle per game is pretty good thanks Why let facts get in the way of a demented argument? We (and Ade) deffo missed Gidley last night though. And I thought Wello should have had stopped one of their try scorers.

: Sat Apr 25, 2009 1:01 pm  

BigRedV wrote:

Why let facts get in the way of a demented argument?

We (and Ade) deffo missed Gidley last night though. And I thought Wello should have had stopped one of their try scorers.

We missed gid's defence more than his attack

: Sat Apr 25, 2009 1:37 pm  

St Helens are a team full of average players, who are only made to look good by ermmm, the other average players around them. This is a FACT.

I mean lets be honest here, fans of random mid table teams like Wigan and Hull KR would know what average players look like, so their opinions should be counted as FACT

: Sat Apr 25, 2009 2:07 pm  

Gardner the turnstyle.

We got beat so what so did leeds no harm done, better to get beat this week than next against a really poor side.