: Tue May 19, 2009 3:30 pm  

joe d saint wrote:

what about lomax at FB an wellens on the wing.

We're going to be disrupted as it is. There's no point moving any more players about. If Lomax plays, I would stick him on the wing.

: Tue May 19, 2009 3:30 pm  

I am raging, we could have had Kevin Penny

: Tue May 19, 2009 3:36 pm  

marsh316 wrote:

I am raging, we could have had Kevin Penny

bu99er......beat me to it
TBH, Turnstile Gardner is a bigger loss to us than you.

: Tue May 19, 2009 3:56 pm  

Sthelens RLFC wrote:

We're going to be disrupted as it is. There's no point moving any more players about. If Lomax plays, I would stick him on the wing.

Please can nobody suggest Wellens on the wing ever again. EVER.

Depending on other injury sitatuations, first choice on wings should be Wheeler and Eastmond, with Gilmour & Gidders at Centre.

If we need Wheeler at Centre, go with Lomax on the wing.

Re: No Wingers for Friday? : Tue May 19, 2009 5:30 pm  

Ski wrote:

Play Mr Phil

We're not that f*cking desperate!

: Tue May 19, 2009 5:54 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

Shall we lend you Ainscough to get him some more experience?

No thanks! I've heard he crap under the high ball and weak in defence.

: Tue May 19, 2009 5:58 pm  

I'd put lomax and eastmond on the wings and leave wheeler centre.

We might get to see eastmond play then this week

: Tue May 19, 2009 6:15 pm  

St pete wrote:

I'd put lomax and eastmond on the wings and leave wheeler centre.

We might get to see eastmond play then this week

I see where your coming from, but i'd have two experienced centres with inexperienced wingers, Quins arn't 4th for nothing
p.s. i understand gilly isn't an experienced centre, but he is an experienced player

: Tue May 19, 2009 6:22 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

I see where your coming from, but i'd have two experienced centres with inexperienced wingers, Quins arn't 4th for nothing
p.s. i understand gilly isn't an experienced centre, but he is an experienced player

See what you saying but when teams have injuries they just have to put up with it.

Wheeler has looked like he played there all his life and I'm sure gidley will look after 1 of them.

We need gilmour in 2nd row as our pack lacks depth.

: Tue May 19, 2009 6:31 pm  

St pete wrote: See what you saying but when teams have injuries they just have to put up with it. Wheeler has looked like he played there all his life and I'm sure gidley will look after 1 of them. We need gilmour in 2nd row as our pack lacks depth. If wilks is back we have cloughy, wilks, flannery, ashurst and tony p for the back row. Admittedly i can see tony p going to prop this weekend, but that still leave quite a few. I just see this lad running through kyle and gary on their winghttp://www.league.quins.co.uk/squad ... ef=dynamic

St pete wrote: See what you saying but when teams have injuries they just have to put up with it. Wheeler has looked like he played there all his life and I'm sure gidley will look after 1 of them. We need gilmour in 2nd row as our pack lacks depth. If wilks is back we have cloughy, wilks, flannery, ashurst and tony p for the back row. Admittedly i can see tony p going to prop this weekend, but that still leave quite a few. I just see this lad running through kyle and gary on their winghttp://www.league.quins.co.uk/squad ... ef=dynamic