Ski wrote:
O'Loughlin and Hock are different players. I've always thought Wigan use Pubehead wrong. He is better as a solid line runner and someone to really rely on in defence. He is an awkward ball player, and Wigan would be better suited with some one with a bit more flair at 13, allowing him to roam, tackle and make yards off his running.
Hock can be a devastating player. He is a great runner, and if he can be pulled in a bit, he can learn to utilise his offloads better. Cut out the brain farts and I would have him starting for England because he would punch holes in any defence. With players like Pryce, Burrow and Roby backing up for the offload, you have a winning combination.
Hock can be a devastating player. He is a great runner, and if he can be pulled in a bit, he can learn to utilise his offloads better. Cut out the brain farts and I would have him starting for England because he would punch holes in any defence. With players like Pryce, Burrow and Roby backing up for the offload, you have a winning combination.
Agree mate that they're totally different players. I just think overall O'Loughlin brings that little bit more value to a side. It is very hard to compare though.
Anyway back on track with Clough.