: Tue May 26, 2009 7:02 pm  

Ashmeister wrote:

Shizer and people think the likes of Bannister have bad influences off the pitch. Thompson beats them all, absolute penis!

Was thompo number 10 in your signature ?

: Tue May 26, 2009 7:08 pm  

Supreme Sydney2002 wrote:

Was thompo number 10 in your signature ?

Sounds more like he came onto him in the shower or something, some real venom in those words.

: Tue May 26, 2009 7:12 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

:lol:

Sounds more like he came onto him in the shower or something, some real venom in those words.

I would have venom in my words to if a man came onto me in the shower, dont midn him doing it when I am dry, but not when I am getting a wash.

: Tue May 26, 2009 8:16 pm  

Supreme Sydney2002 wrote:

I would have venom in my words to if a man came onto me in the shower, dont midn him doing it when I am dry, but not when I am getting a wash.

From what i`ve heard you wouldn`t be dry for long

: Wed May 27, 2009 12:15 pm  

Ostick does seem to lack bulk but Mick Potter does see a young players physical development as a priority. Bryn Hargreaves has definitely developed since coming to Saints and was probably at a similar age as Ostick when he came.

Looking at Matt James who is on loan at Halifax from Bradford, a prop that is of Superleague quality should be much too good for the Championship. Ostick does not look anywhere near as good as James.

: Thu May 28, 2009 9:48 am  

Crap rumour. Why would Saints take a punt on a player who has looked solid, but unspectacular outside SL? Especially given that they have other young props in waiting such as Emmitt, Frodsham and others.

: Thu May 28, 2009 10:10 am  

eddiewaringsflatcap wrote:

Crap rumour. Why would Saints take a punt on a player who has looked solid, but unspectacular outside SL? Especially given that they have other young props in waiting such as Emmitt, Frodsham and others.

I agree with this, for us to want him he would need to be the stand out player in that league at the very least.

: Thu May 28, 2009 10:47 am  

Saint Simon wrote:

I agree with this, for us to want him he would need to be the stand out player in that league at the very least.

Absolutely. It's a no brainer and a bad rumour.

Psssttt I hear Saints are after Mick Nanyn (oh sorry that was 2001 hitting me in the head)

: Mon Jun 01, 2009 3:45 pm  

We don't need another Hargreaves, we need another Paul Anderson/Jason Cayless, so unless this lad has genuine top class potential and real physical presence I can't see the point really.

: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:57 pm  

Dux wrote:

We don't need another Hargreaves, we need another Paul Anderson/Jason Cayless, so unless this lad has genuine top class potential and real physical presence I can't see the point really.

Indeed.

I think with Sean Long leaving and no doubt one or two others leaving, we'll have plenty of space of the cap to re-jig our squad and improve in some weak areas with some real quality whilst continuing to give the youngsters a chance.