: Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:58 pm  

Ski wrote:

No one is getting carried away.

We are saying our academy has provided us with great success, it has, in recent years there are ten plus names who will be Saints regulars next season, and more who failed to make the grade playing rugby elsewhere.

TBH I think the is a lot of people getting carried away.

I'd love it if all saints team was home grown lads but the is no chance that all of the kids will make it.

: Tue Jun 09, 2009 6:02 pm  

St pete wrote:

TBH I think the is a lot of people getting carried away.

I'd love it if all saints team was home grown lads but the is no chance that all of the kids will make it.

Thank you Mystic Meg. How about tomorrow's lottery results too?

: Tue Jun 09, 2009 6:09 pm  

Ski wrote:

Thank you Mystic Meg. How about tomorrow's lottery results too?

If you think all them kids will be playing at a high level for saints for next 10 years then you living in a dream land.

I hope they all do but IMO we will be lucky to get half of them playing at the level we are used to.

Not getting carried away?

I've heard lomax is next wello

Armstrong better than meli

Tyrer next Lyon

Dixon the next scully

EMMITT IS BETTER THAN BRYN after the young lad had played 1 gamek

: Tue Jun 09, 2009 6:32 pm  

St pete wrote:

If you think all them kids will be playing at a high level for saints for next 10 years then you living in a dream land.

I hope they all do but IMO we will be lucky to get half of them playing at the level we are used to.

Not getting carried away?

I've heard lomax is next wello

Armstrong better than meli

Tyrer next Lyon

Dixon the next scully

EMMITT IS BETTER THAN BRYN after the young lad had played 1 gamek

You really do know NOTHING about RL.

Give it up mate

: Tue Jun 09, 2009 6:37 pm  

St pete wrote:

If you think all them kids will be playing at a high level for saints for next 10 years then you living in a dream land.

I hope they all do but IMO we will be lucky to get half of them playing at the level we are used to.

Not getting carried away?

I've heard lomax is next wello

Armstrong better than meli

Tyrer next Lyon

Dixon the next scully

EMMITT IS BETTER THAN BRYN after the young lad had played 1 gamek

Prove it.

: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:28 am  

I think most people have their feet on the ground. These kids are outstanding prospects, but there is no absolute guarantee they will succeed.

However, you've got a better chance of succeeding if you are an outstanding prospect. Haven't seen too many obviously mediocre juniors developing into internationals (although there are plenty of average/slightly above-average ones who have - Roby & Wellens spring to mind).

: Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:40 am  

Watched this kid in the reserves since he was 17, think he has real potential, seems to have the right attitude as well.

: Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:50 pm  

For anyone who follows the kids closely;

Who do they (you) think has the most potential:

MacGennis (sic)
Dixon
Ashurst

: Wed Jun 10, 2009 6:17 pm  

Carlos Alberto wrote:

For anyone who follows the kids closely;

Who do they (you) think has the most potential:

MacGennis (sic)
Dixon
Ashurst

All great lads with tremendous potential and I would expect all three to make it in the first team. Who has the most potential of those three? I would say Dicko - but that is not to detract from the others.

: Wed Jun 10, 2009 6:40 pm  

St pete wrote:

If you think all them kids will be playing at a high level for saints for next 10 years then you living in a dream land.

I hope they all do but IMO we will be lucky to get half of them playing at the level we are used to.

Not getting carried away?

I've heard lomax is next wello

Armstrong better than meli

Tyrer next Lyon

Dixon the next scully

EMMITT IS BETTER THAN BRYN after the young lad had played 1 gamek

agree entirely...youll not hear of half of them in a couple of years.
some people make out theyre worldbeaters..wev'e heard all that before.