: Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:01 pm  

paul bate wrote:

We could be in trouble looking at that scarey Salford squad

Saddened! wrote:

It's not like we've never struggled against Salford, even with better squads than we have now.

paul bate wrote:

If we are behind at half time, meet me at the burger van and i`ll buy you one

Saint Simon wrote:

Salford have Myler, Parker, White, Talau, Fitzpatrick out. Apart from Myler and talau a few years ago, what a bunch of no mark names, no wonder they're struggling. We should have no problems, they are similar to wakefield in that everything goes through 1 playmaker and they have no options after that.

Did no-one ever tell you lot that pride comes before a fall ... or that being an arrogant bast.ard comes before an embarrassing defeat?!

: Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:43 pm  

paul bate wrote:

We could be in trouble looking at that scarey Salford squad

Oh how sweet.

: Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:48 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

Do you have any distinguishing features? I don't wanna be going round asking all 3,000 people if they are 'The Paul Bate who owes me a hamburger'?

Did you find him?

: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:19 pm  

paul bate wrote:

We could be in trouble looking at that scarey Salford squad

as i said i hope that doesnt come back to haunt you oh deary me are you spooked yet

: Sat Jul 04, 2009 8:53 am  

Saint Simon wrote:

Salford have Myler, Parker, White, Talau, Fitzpatrick out. Apart from Myler and talau a few years ago, what a bunch of no mark names, no wonder they're struggling. We should have no problems, they are similar to wakefield in that everything goes through 1 playmaker and they have no options after that.

: Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:41 am  

Always on the cards, being defeated by a lower team (no actual pun intended, but they are all lower than Saints at the moment), but the saying still holds good ..."You win nowt with kids."

Well done Bomber, worked out a truely winning game plan