Re: Matty Smith : Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:07 pm  

FearTheVee wrote:

That was already confirmed in the MEN article wasn't it?

I never believe anything until I've heard it from Saints... Papers don't always print factual stories

Re: Matty Smith : Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:08 pm  

Red Preacher wrote:

So, let me get this straight. Matty Smith is widely respected at your place?

Hes not in the same class as what we have. but he has proved he can do a job. Nothing spectacular but will give us some organisation and a very good kicking game. We have injuries in the halves so he would be better than having to move other players out of position.

Re: Matty Smith : Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:08 pm  

Red Preacher wrote:

So, let me get this straight. Matty Smith is widely respected at your place?

Good, solid organising 7. Exactly what we need at the moment.

Less talented than Wheeler/Eastmond/Lomax though, so was let go.

Wish Wheeler/Eastmond/Lomax were half as robust as him though!

Re: Matty Smith : Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:10 pm  

Fatbelly wrote:

If Smith does return to Saints, how will it fit with the salary cap?

playing for free for the love of the club.

Re: Matty Smith : Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:11 pm  

Confirmed http://www.saintsrlfc.com/news/2810

Confirmed http://www.saintsrlfc.com/news/2810

Re: Matty Smith : Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:12 pm  

saint billy wrote:

Hes not in the same class as what we have. but he has proved he can do a job. Nothing spectacular but will give us some organisation and a very good kicking game. We have injuries in the halves so he would be better than having to move other players out of position.

Fair assessment of him. And I suppose that every player moved out of position to accomodate the injured halves is only going to create new problems. Good move Saints!

All the best for Friday.

Re: Matty Smith : Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:22 pm  

I want us to keep hold of Matty, thought he was very underrated here after his heroics getting us to the 2007 GF, would have been a better option than Scott Moore IMO.
I hope he tears it up, and the saints board are left embarrased by the decision.

Re: Matty Smith : Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:25 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

I want us to keep hold of Matty, thought he was very underrated here after his heroics getting us to the 2007 GF, would have been a better option than Scott Moore IMO.
I hope he tears it up, and the saints board are left embarrased by the decision.

Would it be Leon or Eastmond you would have had him in front of? If you think we'd play him hooker - he's no Roby and we resigned Moore in the year he made the Dream Team at hooker.

Even if he wins every MOM between now and the GF, there's no reason for the board to be embarrassed about the decision not to re-sign him. He's 23 years old - he doesn't want to be sat around waiting for injuries to better players, nor could our salary cap allow him to do that with Lomax/Wheeler who can play in the halves.

Re: Matty Smith : Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:38 pm  

Others have summed it up, he's not in the same league and doesn't have that bit of magic that Kyle does, but he's a more than competent squad member and a great option for Saints to have.

He'll do a solid job for Saints and in particular our kicking game should improve with him in the team.

Re: Matty Smith : Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:40 pm  

In the days of pay as you play contracts, the likes of Wheeler and Eastmond would have had a pain killing injection and go out onto the field. I seriously think that some of these young pro's expect to be 100% fit and healthy for every game when in reality, someone like Longy and Kieron spent their entire career carrying one injury or another.