: Tue May 05, 2009 5:17 pm  

Fishsta wrote:

No, it's not. It's voicing an opinion on a blight on Rugby League, which you are entitled to disagree with and attempt a reasonable argument by trying to back up any counter-claim you make with some facts.

Unfortunately, I'm right and you're not. Sorry.

How is JW a "blight on rugby league" and, say, Feka isn't? Bet you didn't mind Terry Newton wearing cherry and white.

Some good Wigan posters on here, you're not one of them.

: Tue May 05, 2009 6:09 pm  

x~Gilly~x wrote:

Yeah, your's. GROW UP!

I don't recall using gutter language... ah, that's because I didn't. In fact the only gutter language was in fact aimed at me. If you can't see that then there is really very little chance of you passing your Gcse exams in 8 years time.

: Tue May 05, 2009 6:11 pm  

Fishsta wrote: I don't recall using gutter language... ah, that's because I didn't. In fact the only gutter language was in fact aimed at me. If you can't see that then there is really very little chance of you passing your Gcse exams in 8 years time. I'd be so angry with the world if I was still suffering acne at 35

Fishsta wrote: I don't recall using gutter language... ah, that's because I didn't. In fact the only gutter language was in fact aimed at me. If you can't see that then there is really very little chance of you passing your Gcse exams in 8 years time. I'd be so angry with the world if I was still suffering acne at 35

: Tue May 05, 2009 6:13 pm  

Yes you did miss Wilkin on Saturday, but IMO you missed Cayless far more.
If Saints don't find another prop to help Graham out he'll be burnt out in three more years or less.

And you can see now why we chose to keep Prescott (and O'Carroll) over Hargreaves.

: Tue May 05, 2009 6:14 pm  

FearTheVee wrote:

:lol:

How is JW a "blight on rugby league" and, say, Feka isn't? Bet you didn't mind Terry Newton wearing cherry and white.

Some good Wigan posters on here, you're not one of them.

Feka isn't a dirty player who spouts crap in newspapers.

And regarding Newton, he owned Cunningham every time. If it weren't for his moments he'd have been a legend. I'd rather have had Newton than Wilkin any day. Wilkin is a thug, although he has improved a little.

: Tue May 05, 2009 6:16 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

Yes you did miss Wilkin on Saturday, but IMO you missed Cayless far more.

Cayless hasnt been playing well since 2007 and we really should have let go of him at the end of last season. Another prop is vital to help Graham out otherwise as I have said before he will end up like Fielden.

: Tue May 05, 2009 6:16 pm  

Ski wrote: I'd be so angry with the world if I was still suffering acne at 35 Lol. You've got that all to come when you've hit puberty.

Ski wrote: I'd be so angry with the world if I was still suffering acne at 35 Lol. You've got that all to come when you've hit puberty.

: Tue May 05, 2009 6:22 pm  

Keep the personal insults to pm, carry on and you'll be taking long walks off short piers.

Ty

: Tue May 05, 2009 7:06 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

Yes you did miss Wilkin on Saturday, but IMO you missed Cayless far more.
If Saints don't find another prop to help Graham out he'll be burnt out in three more years or less.

And you can see now why we chose to keep Prescott (and O'Carroll) over Hargreaves.

I agree with the first part, but i actually thought Brynn was one of our better players on saturday. At least he looked interested.

: Tue May 05, 2009 7:58 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

I agree with the first part, but i actually thought Brynn was one of our better players on saturday. At least he looked interested.

He was embarrassed.