: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:47 am  

A word of caution in that those drawings haven't been touched in two years, have a look at the last revision date 22.05.07.

In fact the architect has actually moved office since they were produced.

: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:48 am  

Paul Youane wrote:

A word of caution in that those drawings haven't been touched in two years, have a look at the last revision date 22.05.07.

In fact the architect has actually moved office since they were produced.

You mean it could get even better??????

: Thu Jun 18, 2009 11:03 am  

Billinge_Lump wrote:

It's what they always said it would be.

They did say at one point that the standing would be in the corners.

It is strange that they have seperated one of the main sides rather than an end for the away supporters.

The size layout and seat/standing proportion looks pretty good.

: Thu Jun 18, 2009 11:12 am  

Noel Cleal wrote:

They did say at one point that the standing would be in the corners.

It is strange that they have seperated one of the main sides rather than an end for the away supporters.

The size layout and seat/standing proportion looks pretty good.

That was part of the doomed old plans by Howard Morris and co. that never had a cat in hell's chance of going ahead, because we were close to bankruptcy.

I think its always been said that standing areas would be behind the posts in the current proposals.

: Thu Jun 18, 2009 11:15 am  

(Saint) wrote:

That was part of the doomed old plans by Howard Morris and co. that never had a cat in hell's chance of going ahead, because we were close to bankruptcy.

I think its always been said that standing areas would be behind the posts in the current proposals.

Your probably right. Morris' plans did always seem very pie in the sky. Memory is playing tricks on me in my old age.

: Thu Jun 18, 2009 2:59 pm  

Paul Youane wrote:

A word of caution in that those drawings haven't been touched in two years, have a look at the last revision date 22.05.07.

In fact the architect has actually moved office since they were produced.

The plans haven't been touched in a looooooooong time

: Thu Jun 18, 2009 3:02 pm  

Saint Simon wrote:

and a picture of Mathers as avatar

its called takin the mick

: Thu Jun 18, 2009 3:44 pm  

Noel Cleal wrote:

They did say at one point that the standing would be in the corners.

It is strange that they have seperated one of the main sides rather than an end for the away supporters.

The size layout and seat/standing proportion looks pretty good.

Why do we need a seperate end for the away supporters?

: Thu Jun 18, 2009 3:48 pm  

Southport Saint wrote:

Why do we need a seperate end for the away supporters?

Do you REALLY want to mingle with them dirty Wiganers?

: Thu Jun 18, 2009 4:27 pm  

Ski wrote:

Do you REALLY want to mingle with them dirty Wiganers?

Large spaces at the sides for an early and quick exit

Most ground have the away section as the seperate bit we seem to have one of the sides.